>>8076976

Boo Hoo.

The reason this site is great because we are FREE here.

That freedom is contagious, luscious, desirable and alive.

The reason we "get it right" and "viral" at times is because of that freedom;

to think, to "be wrong" while getting it right.

Brainstorm.

If you are afraid of making a mistake or being wrong, you will never win.

To win you must be strong enough to make a mistake. That's how one learns. Is there any other way than to be unafraid of failure?

The "price" of the freedom here is all the unwanted gumk that must be waded through.

But you never know! What is junk /gunk and what will lead to something important?

If people weren't free to post bwebs, would that ruin the chemistry / alchemy of the site?

kek

It's going to get better.

don't boss.

Notables claims a YT vid of Giuliani

But it's not there.

Discussed in the SALT talks with Russia

Back in the Day. Long articals in "The Nation" and in "the New Yorker" from them discussed it all in details.

It led to MAD "Mutual Assured Destruction" which must be related to "Doomsday machine"

Assange likely used that strategy of cutting off an option to make the treat more tenable.

"Dead Man's Switch"

If anything happens to him material will be loosed.

If it's done right it will work.

Kappy didn't do it right?

"A way to visualize a commitment scheme is to think of a sender as putting a message in a locked box, and giving the box to a receiver. The message in the box is hidden from the receiver, who cannot open the lock themselves. Since the receiver has the box, the message inside cannot be changed–merely revealed if the sender chooses to give them the key at some later time."

^^^describes dead man's switch

>>8077391