1/3

Dug Moar the "precommittment" string 4bb96075acadc3d80b5 re: Pedo-esta & Kerry (check notables from post number No.8075623, bread #10337)

I also Searched duck for the string and found this youtube with DJT called Farhenheit 119 (no that's not a typo - why 119??): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBKgbN7PD_Y

and this: https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/787777344740163584

"pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809"

And this youtube with DJT called Farhenheit 119 (no that's not a typo - why 119??) Sorry I don't know how to embed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBKgbN7PD_Y

AND THEN THIS

Very interdasting article from 2016. I quite literally had to read this article about 5 times before it finally started making sense… https://emptylighthouse.com/what-are-numbers-wikileaks-keep-tweeting-john-kerry-ecuador-uk-fco-2086433286

My takeaway from the article is 1) the concept of using the numbers as a hash or a key - Remember when Q told us that the photos he posts (and their odd jpg names) MEANS SOMETHING…. and 2) The who strategy in an adversarial position (ha - seems to me that Q / POTUS has the black hats in a CheckMate right now.

This is the article about Precommitment strategy in an adversarial situation I had to read over and over….worth trying to wrap your head around it:

Wikileaks "Precommitment"

To understand what these numbers mean, we first should understand what a "pre-commitment" is. According to Wikipedia, a precommitment means:

"Precommitment is a strategy in which a party to a conflict uses a commitment device to strengthen its position by cutting off some of its options to make its threats more credible. Any party employing a Strategy of Deterrence faces the problem that retaliating against an attack may ultimately result in significant damage to their own side. If this damage is significant enough, then the opponent may take the view that such retaliation would be irrational, and therefore, that the threat lacks credibility, and hence, it ceases to be an effective deterrent. Precommitment improves the credibility of a threat, either by imposing significant penalties on the threatening party for not following through, or, by making it impossible to not respond."

Wikipedia uses the example of burning a bridge after crossing it, so they can't possibly retreat.

So Wikileaks is threatening to everyone that they are definitely going to perform some action – so what is it? And why do they feel the need to threaten?

We also need to look at what a commitment scheme is (again from Wikipedia):

"A way to visualize a commitment scheme is to think of a sender as putting a message in a locked box, and giving the box to a receiver. The message in the box is hidden from the receiver, who cannot open the lock themselves. Since the receiver has the box, the message inside cannot be changed–merely revealed if the sender chooses to give them the key at some later time."

>>8077391

2/3

'''Wikileaks Hash, Key, Encryption Numbers

The numbers that Wikileaks posted: 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809, eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72, and f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74 appear to be what are called hashes or keys.

There are two theories about this. The first theory is that the numbers are hashes, which will be used to verify some information.

The second theory is that they are keys, as part of a scheme, so that if things go wrong, information can be released.''' Read on for details.

Wikileaks pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

As an example, let's look at pre-commitment 1. The number 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809 is related to some material to be released on John Kerry.

In theory 1, this would be a verification for the authenticity of the material. But that doesn't sound particularly useful.

However, in theory 2, that is a number that would unlock material that someone has. Now, that could be useful… Why?

Wikileaks pre-commitment 2: Ecuador eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72

In theory 2, we would have to assume that certain people all over the world have access to this information – 3 sets, one on John Kerry, one on the UK FCO, and one on Ecuador (which is strange because Assange is in the Ecuadorian embassy – perhaps these are codenames?).

Whoever has these materials all over the world would be unable to read them or do anything with them since they are encrypted. But with the key that Assange tweeted out, suddenly these materials become readable and possible to disseminate.

But why now and why haven't they done this before?

Wikileaks pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74

The reason they're doing this now is because it appears that Assange thinks things are going to "go down" for him. We've seen strange things have been happening to Wikileaks and Assange over the past week.

There have been a lot of DDOS attacks, which are attacks in which a bunch of computers – generally spread out all over – keep connecting and sending data to a target in order to flood that target.

So in Wikileaks case, someone has been trying to make the Wikileaks server inaccessible.

And now Wikileaks has released this: (WikiLeaks Tweet Oct 17, 2016)

"Julian Assange's internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans."

So clearly Assange thinks something big is going to happen.

>>8077402

3/3

Wikileaks Contingency Plan

So what is the Wikileaks contingency plan. Well, it appears that there are operatives across the world who have the packets of information described above, and that Wikileaks has just given them the green light to do something with them.

Now that the keys are public, the holders of the information can look at it and post it as they choose.

So if Assange is killed, or captured, or his servers are confiscated or somehow incapacitated, the material will still be released.

What does this mean? Clearly, Assange thinks something serious is about to happen, and he wants to ensure that the information that he has becomes public.

Now what does Assange think is going to happen to him? And what is the material contained in those three packets? We don't know yet, but we'll likely find out soon.

>>8077391

??

>>8077411

Yowsa!