put a ctitical eye on the fakeness and sometimes it just reveals itself.
threshold effect is your friend.
I think that the article about the so-called C_A candidate being a serial dog-strangler has a lot wrong with it that is obvious. An article such as that usually wouldn't show up as a top headline.
and the bleed through . . . seems wrong. I've done some threshold and mirroring of the image to reveal words that, while the letters seem flipped, no matter which way you mirror it the capital letter is mirrored in the wrong direction to be at the start of a word.
image attached will show this to the discerning. however, maybe the bleed through is some wierd copy. Point: I say that the image is 99% fake and ghhaaaayee.
and we shouldn't be pushing it as real.
but if someoen has another copy of it that shows the newspaper with more clarity, or in multiple images, that also show the back side (what is printed on the 'other side' of the page or on the page 'above' (how a bleed through would happen . . .)
without that I ascertain that the image is most likely a fake. And I won't object is someone proves me wrong.