>>8422039

[Part 1]

Canadian Lawfag Here:

A "sealed indictment" is an artifact of the Grand Jury system, which was abolished in Canada decades and decades ago, out of concern about political interference in due process in criminal prosecutions, and yet also (somewhat ironically) preserved in the United States out of concerns about political interference in due process in criminal prosecutions.

Consequently, there is no such thing in Canadian Law as a "Sealed Grand Jury Indictment" in the sense discussed in the Qnverse, and catalogued in those posts about the mind-boggling number of such that have been slowly accumulating in the USA for the last two or three years (Durham, Huber investigations, etc.).

So, in a sense, you are asking the wrong question.

>>8422039

[Part 2]

Here are two questions either of which might be what you really want to ask:

(1) How many of the Secret Grand Jury Sealed Indictments name Canadian citizens, politicians, elites, whomever, as the accused – that is, accused of criminal offences under either American federal or American state criminal laws?

(2) Have the RCMP, SQ, OPP or any local police forces been investigating similar crimes (present or past), and discovered sufficient evidence that would, in the fullness of time (that is, upon completion of their investigations) cause them to "swear out an information", charging these Canadian politicians/elites with crimes?

Somewhat related to (2), is the possibility that CSIS is conducting investigations, either in conjunction with, or independently from, the RCMP Security Service.

>>8422039

[Part 3]

If so, and IIUC, then CSIS has official (i.e., formal legal) procedures to (eventually) request that the RCMP file charges on their behalf.

However, as the Pickton mass murder investigation showed (to those with discerning eyes), and as the (late 1990s) cover-up of the investigation into child rape by high ranking police officers in Cornwall showed, and so on – all of Canada's police services are deeply compromised by many decades' worth of Cabal infiltration and corruption.

>>8422039

[Part 4]

A further thought, the implications of which I do not know how to begin researching, is what the answers might be to question (1), above:

Back in the late 20th Century, the Bush (for which, read 'Cabal') presidency invaded Panama – a military invasion ostensibly to help bring an end to the use of Panama as a drug transit and money laundering hub. This led to the military arrest, extra-judicial extradition to the continental USA, trial and eventual imprisonment of the then-President of Panama, Manuel Noriega (aka "Pineapple-face").

But, quite obviously (to those with discerning eyes. because it was the Bush Clown crime family that was smuggling the cocaine into the USA), all of this had to have been the result of some dispute either within the Cabal, or between the Cabal upper crust and some of its "low-ranking" assets, such as President Noriega.

In other words (no surprise), the official history of that invasion is entirely bullshit – no surprise.

>>8422039

[Part 5]

The reason I bring this up, is simply to point out that there is a precedent for the United States to arrest and try the head of government of another country.

And of course, the obvious relevance of this to your (implicit) question, is that Q has asked, in the context of the Uranium One scandal, "Why is the Prime Minister of Canada so important"?

>>8422039

[Part 6]

Hypothetically, Justin "I am a serial adulterer who has had a prominent Toronto Law firm pay off dozens and dozens of women in NDAs to prevent them from destroying my Captain Feminism political persona", is up to his neck in the illegal and (American-)treasonous sale of ~20% of the US' uranium supply to Russia, with (much of) the money being laundered through to Hillary's 2016 Presidential Campaign.

If so, although strictly speaking (as Canadian Prime Ministers are sworn in to Office with oaths of allegiance to "Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada", and not with oaths to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America) it is meaningless to suggest that Justin Trudeau could in any way be guilty of Treason against the United States of America (unlike, say, George W. Bush, or Hillary Clinton), it is reasonable to suppose that there is evidence out there, known to Q+ ("We have it all"), that Justin Trudeau is guilty of other crimes against the United States, or of crimes under American federal or state criminal law.

Consequently, for example, it is very possible that Trudeau personally is named as an accused in some of the American's sealed secret Grand Jury indictments. In fact, I would be very surprised if, when the last indictment is sealed, and they begin to be unsealed, he is not named anywhere in any of them as at least an unindicted co-conspirator.

>>8422039

[Part 7]

And if he is … well, what happens next will depend on how far he has fallen out of grace politically, up here in Canada. For example, given out Minority Parliament situation at the moment, one political wrong move by Trudeau could send up back into an election, which he might well lose, perhaps badly. If he were to lose his seat, and just be "citizen Trudeau" when the US sealed indictments begin to be unsealed – then it would just be a matter of the Americans requesting his extradition, through the appropriate, conventional, existing procedures.

All of which assumes Justin Trudeau won't be facing charges under the Canadian Criminal Code – in which case any American extradition request would have to wait until Trudeau (if convicted) finishes his Canadian jail sentence.

>>8422039

[Part 8]

An all of that assumes that Trudeau would actually survive to do so, given the cold, conscious-devoid way the Cabal disposes of anyone who is an obstacle to its continued grip on power (see, e.g., Olaf Palme, JFK, Portugal's PM, etc., etc.) – and, equally, given what Q has hinted, about "they will not be able to walk safely down the street": D'Arcy Magee could explain what that might mean.

I don't know if that answers your question, Anon.

And another CanadaLawFag might come along and post a reply which points out important things I've gotten wrong, or left out.

But that's all I've got for you at the moment. Hope it helps.

>>8427470

"[…] given our Minority Parliament situation at the moment, one political wrong move by Trudeau could send us back into an election, […]"

– pardon my typing, Anon.

>>8427478

"[…] given the cold, *conscence-devoid way the Cabal[…]"