>>8086582

So surely we don't just have to take your word for it?

>>8086650

>>8086582

You are really bad at this for someone who was bragging about his credentials. You come in claiming death and destruction, and when challenged you post a snip from Google of a review of a run-of-the-mill linear amp.

Terrifying shit right there. Kek.

>>8086789

<I don't have sauce

Of course you don't. Because you're full of shit.

>>8086973

<do the needful

So you're an offshored asset at that. Kek.

>>8086766

<220 scientists have all signed papers testifying to the dangers

How many have signed papers testifying to a climate emergency that will have us all dead by 2020?

Oops.

<Safety limitations

<ultimate surveillance

Just throwing anything at the wall to see what might stick?

I'm through with this slide.

>>8087056

First the 5G chicken littles and now the coomer shows up, I wonder…

Is 4chins down or sumpin?