I checked the site, but no conclusions on authenticity….but what the hell?
Is Novel Corona Virus Reservoir BioWar Syringe or Bat Soup?
It seems the evidence continues to show that the novel corona virus is likely a bio weapon, not a bat soup infection.
Date Created: 2020, February 10
My original thought was that there was a problem with China's new 13 valent pneumonia vaccine. It was approved and on the market when announced. The vaccine uses 13 strains of pneumonia encased in tetanus toxiod to illicit immune response. The main study also injected children with DTaP, diptheria, tetanus and pertusis, concurrently, and no minimization of effects were observed. The study mentions using a new fetal cell line from a three month gestation female fetus. It was a water-bag birth to ensure survival for disection and harvest. The lungs were harvested for the new line of cells for vaccines and other harvested organs distributed accordingly.
I believe that an error in manufacture, either by accident or design, would have effectively immunized the children against the 13 strains of pneumonia. However unvaccinated adults in the area could become incredibly ill if they contracted 13 strains of pneumonia at one time. It would quite literally pop their lungs in the same manner as numerous videos coming from China.
If it were a catastrophic human error, or unexpected response to a vaccine, it would have been logical to attempt to cover it up by arresting the first eight doctors who attempted to warn everyone of the new coronavirus, like nothing they had ever seen before.
Of course, my original thoughts were poo-poo'd, insulted and labeled 'conspiracy theory'. However, no one has a more plausable, possible or probably chain of events than what I originally thought.
Since I really wanted to get to the bottom of this, I kept looking for information…
Here we go, what I found that all seeems to tie into a really bad scenario…
The United States successfully created their first man-made coronavirus in 2015. It was worked on during a ban on making viruses lethal enacted in 2003, since the project began before the ban went into effect. The publicly stated intentions were to be able to understand this type of virus more fully to be able to make effective vaccines.
In 2017, the federal ban on making lethal viruses was lifted. Groups were allowed to apply for project research using known lethal pathogens, such as ebola and corona viruses. After review of ethics, benefit must outweight risks, of the stated proposed purpose, the project was either granted or denied. One of the conditions I found may be a bad thing, is the research is done in secrecey - studies are not published since it relates to the process of making lethal pathogens even more lethal.
The heads of each of these departments is hand-selected and appointed by the President…
1