TY Baker!!!
So, Mr. Cates is on a bit of a rant over Seth Rich, today. I just want to put this out there:
It doesn't matter if you agree with Brian re: his take on Seth Rich. What he is stating is, back your claims with evidence. If you do not have evidence, then state your theory as such. Until it's backed with evidence, you have no claim; only a theory.
This is important. We should be holding ourselves to a higher standard of reporting - above the MSM standard. Brian knows about Q, and doesn't need to publicly acknowledge Q in order to get the Qanons riled up to post their proofs to get the word out. We know about Podesta's "example" email. We know about JA's interview where his body language says that Seth is the leaker; not Russians. Brian himself said he didn't buy the Russian hack story.
What Brian is saying is, back your claims with evidence. This is a most valid point to make, and anons need to understand that. We know and trust Q. We know and trust Q isn't leading us astray on Seth. We do NOT know all the details because that shit's under lock and key.
And that's a fact.
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1226916073695588358
Brian Cates // Digital Soldier for Flynn
⭐️
⭐️
⭐️
@drawandstrike
·
1h
The only 'evidence' supplied by the DNC/Crowdstrike that "Russians hacked the DNC server!" is…their claim.
The FBI was never allowed to examine the server.
This was an inside job. A DNC staffer disgusted by the corruption leaked to WikiLeaks.