Federal Prosecutors Recommend 67-Yr-Old Roger Stone Serve 7-9 Years in Prison for Process Crimes in Mueller Witch Hunt

Federal Prosecutors recommended today Trump confidante Roger Stone serve 7-9 years in prison for process crimes during the Mueller witch hunt.

Roger Stone is 67 years old.

Axios reported:

Federal prosecutors recommended in a sentencing memo filed Monday that Trump associate Roger Stone serve 87 to 108 months in prison — or 7 to 9 years — for crimes that include obstruction of justice, lying to Congress and witness tampering.

The big picture: Stone, one of several Trump associates to be indicted as a result of the Mueller investigation, was found guilty in November of lying to Congress about his efforts to learn more about when WikiLeaks would publish damaging emails about 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Stone is set to be sentenced on Feb. 20. Former national security adviser Michael Flynn is the only other Trump associate convicted in the Mueller investigation who continues to await sentencing.

Roger Stone was found guilty on ALL SEVEN COUNTS today in DC court in November.

Roger Stone was dragged into court ONLY because he is a prominent Republican activist who supported Donald Trump!

His Process Crimes!

Count 1: Obstructing a congressional investigation

Count 2: Lying to Congress

We just witnesses several Democrats and far left operatives — including Adam Schiff — lying to Congress about a Trump phone call with Ukraine.

They will not be sent to prison.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/02/breaking-federal-prosecutors-recommend-67-yr-old-roger-stone-serve-7-9-years-in-prison-for-process-crimes-in-mueller-witch-hunt/

Does The Coronavirus Threaten The Chinese Communist Party's Grip On Power?

Authoritarianism has made this outbreak worse, not better. The state’s strength in controlling information and suppressing dissent is a weakness in fighting disease.

Nature is unpredictable and sometimes vengeful. Different societies and political systems have different ways of managing it.

Viruses and epidemics can occur in any country. But they have become more dangerous and challenging in modern times as globalisation means they spread faster and farther than ever.

Thus the coronavirus, thought to have originated in the mainland Chinese city of Wuhan, is spreading across the world.

As it does so, it tests not only China’s health infrastructure and management. The course of the epidemic and the government’s responses raise profound questions about the capacity and dynamism of China’s system of one-party rule.

For sure, China’s leadership is now doing everything to contain the virus, just as they had done in fights against natural disasters such as the Sichuan Earthquake in 2008. In fact, China’s command-and-control systems might prove more efficient than anything the free democracies could manage when it comes to mobilising resources.

Beijing won international plaudits for the massive scale of its mobilisation and dramatic measures against the coronavirus. The government has built several temporary hospitals from scratch in just a few weeks, locked down tens of millions of people in quarantine in more than two dozen cities, banned tens of millions more from travelling across the nation and so on.

But the saga has also, once again, exposed the inherent contradictions and flaws in its self-acclaimed political system.

China missed the best opportunity to contain the spread of the virus because officials at first delayed – or possibly covered up – the release of information and were slow in taking precautionary actions. The first patient who experienced symptoms was found on December 1, 2019, suggesting the origin of the disease was even earlier. And there has been some evidence of human-to-human transmissions since late December, with more emerging in early January when several medical workers were infected.

These vital bits of information were not released to the public in time. Nor was any decisive action taken between early December and January 23, the day Beijing told the world about the severity of the epidemic and declared war on it just two days before the Lunar New Year on January 25. Lives continued as normal in Wuhan in the week before then. On January 18, the Wuhan government hosted a banquet attended by more than 40,000 families in a bid to set a Guinness world record. On January 20, the municipal government said it was distributing 200,000 free tickets to residents for festive new year activities.

https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/article/3049589/coronavirus-threatens-chinese-communist-partys-grip-power

Trump Is Discussing Firing Corrupt ICIG Michael Atkinson — Whose Impeachment Testimony Is Still Hidden By Liar Schiff

On Friday anti-Trump Army Lt. Col Alexander Vindman was escorted off the White House grounds and dismissed from the National Security Council. His twin brother Army Lt. Col. Yevgeny Vindman, who served as a lawyer on the NSC was also fired and left with Alex.

There are unofficial reports that White House staffers stood up and cheered as the twin brothers were escorted form the White House.

But President Trump is not done yet.

There are reports that dozens more may be removed this week.

And there are reports that crooked Intelligence Committee Inspector General Michael Atkinson may be asked to leave.

Ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee Devin Nunes told investigative reporter Sara Carter that Republicans are currently investigating Intel Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson.

GOP lawmakers asked Mr. Atkinson to reveal who changed the whistleblower complaint form to allow for second-hand info and office gossip.

And Atkinson’s secret basement testimony during the sham impeachment proceedings was so devastating to Democrats that Adam Schiff STILL refuses to release this transcript to the public.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/02/good-news-trump-is-discussing-firing-corrupt-icig-michael-atkinson-whose-impeachment-testimony-is-still-hidden-by-liar-schiff/

BOOM

BOOM

BOOM

Justice Department Sues State of New Jersey, New Jersey Governor, and New Jersey Attorney General for Prohibiting State Officials From Sharing Information With U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-state-new-jersey-new-jersey-governor-and-new-jersey-attorney-general

Justice Department Sues State of California, California Governor, and California Attorney General for Prohibiting the Operation of Private Detention Facilities in the State

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-state-california-california-governor-and-california-attorney-general

Justice Department Sues King County, Washington, and King County Executive for Prohibiting U.S. Immigrations and Custom Enforcement Contractors From Using King County International Airport

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-king-county-washington-and-king-county-executive-prohibiting-us

Reminder: Industry Insiders Don’t Give Their Products to Their Own Kids. Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, etc.

Most parents want what’s best for their kids. Of course, it’s hard to know what that is when so many companies are marketing products and services without much if any regard for the health and wellbeing of children or anyone else.

When it comes to kids and technology – for many years Silicon Valley parents have been sending their kids to low-tech schools and restricting their use and exposure to devices. We may never know if they have only been concerned about screen addiction or if they have also been concerned about adverse health effects from exposure to harmful Blue Light (see 1, 2, 3) and/or Electromagnetic Radiation (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). There is still no “safe” level of wireless radiation that has been scientifically determined for children or pregnant women.

Of course, industry insiders don’t only make different choices for their families regarding technology. Thanks to Popular Science for providing more details on what concerned parents may want to think twice about giving their kids:

Apple founder Steve Jobs didn’t let his kids use the iPad, or really any product their dad invented, according to a 2014 report from Nick Bilton in The New York Times.

“They haven’t used it,” Jobs told Bilton. “We limit how much technology our kids use at home.” Every night, the family had a phone-free dinner together, according to Walter Isaacson, author of the definitive biography Steve Jobs. “The kids did not seem addicted at all to devices,” Isaacson told Bilton.

Many found Jobs’s choices startling—and for good reason. What does it say about the safety of a product if its creator forbids his own kids from using it? But the tech billionaire’s choices weren’t as unusual as they might seem. From tobacco to food manufacturing to social media, executives and insiders are subtly sounding the alarm in actions, if not in words. Their behaviors provide insight not just into the risks of certain consumer products to children, but to adults, too.

https://governmentslaves.news/2020/02/10/reminder-industry-insiders-dont-give-their-products-to-their-own-kids-steve-jobs-bill-gates-etc/