>>809996

Catherine Oxenberg is descended from royalty. Photo is of a brooch from the Yugoslavian crown jewels collection.

Link to interactive family tree connecting to multiple European royal lines, including Romanovs, Hapsburgs, and many others: https:// gw.geneanet.org/frebault?lang=en&n=oxenberg&oc=0&p=catherine

Catherine Oxenberg is the American-born daughter of Yugoslavia's Princess Elizabeth, a descendant of the Serbian Karađorđević dynasty. She is best known for her role as Amanda Carrington, long-lost daughter of Alexis Carrington (Joan Collins), in the prime time serial Dynasty and as British secret agent Ashley Hunter-Caddington in the 1993 syndicated weekly Acapulco H.E.A.T.

Though born in New York City, Oxenberg grew up in London. She is the eldest daughter of HRH Princess Elizabeth of Yugoslavia and her first husband Howard Oxenberg, a Jewish dress manufacturer and close friend of the Kennedy family. Princess Elizabeth is the only daughter of Prince Paul of Yugoslavia (who served as regent for his cousin's eldest son King Peter II of Yugoslavia) and Princess Olga of Greece and Denmark. Oxenberg's maternal grandmother Princess Olga was the daughter of Grand Duchess Elena Vladimirovna of Russia and Prince Nicholas of Greece and Denmark, himself the son of another Romanov grand duchess, Queen Olga Konstantinovna of the Hellenes and her Danish-born husband King George of Greece, brother of Queen Alexandra of the United Kingdom and Empress Maria Fyodorovna.

Befitting her breeding and bearing, Oxenberg made her acting debut when she was cast as Diana, Princess of Wales in the 1982 TV-movie biopic Royal Romance of Charles and Diana.

Oxenberg joined the hit ABC prime time soap opera Dynasty in 1984 — then at its height of popularity — in the role of Amanda Carrington, the second daughter of Blake Carrington (John Forsythe) and Alexis Colby (Joan Collins). She left Dynasty in 1986 and the role was recast.

In 1987, she starred as Princess Elysa in the television film Roman Holiday. She also appeared in The Lair of the White Worm in 1988, and reprised the role of Diana, Princess of Wales in the TV film Charles and Diana: Unhappily Ever After in 1992. From 1993 to 1994 she starred in the short-lived series Acapulco H.E.A.T.

She was portrayed by Rachael Taylor in the 2005 telemovie Dynasty: The Making of a Guilty Pleasure, a fictionalized retelling of the behind the scenes goings-on during the production of Dynasty. In 2006, Oxenberg appeared in the TV special, Dynasty Reunion: Catfights & Caviar, in which she reunited with her former Dynasty castmates to reminisce about the series.

Personal Life

Oxenberg's first marriage was to the producer Robert Evans, in Beverly Hills, California on July 12, 1998, but the marriage was annulled nine days later.

She met actor Casper Van Dien during the filming of the 1999 TV movie The Collectors, and they worked together again in the 1999 Evangelical Christian thriller The Omega Code. On May 8, 1999 they married in Las Vegas, Nevada. In 2005 the couple appeared in their own reality series, I Married a Princess, which aired on the Lifetime Television channel in the United States and on LIVINGtv in the United Kingdom. During the 2006-2007 TV season, Oxenberg and Van Dien co-starred in the American drama series Watch Over Me on MyNetworkTV.

Oxenberg is the mother of India Riven Oxenberg (born June 7, 1991), whose father has never been publicly identified, and of two children with Van Dien: Maya (born September 20, 2001) and Celeste Alma (born October 3, 2003). Van Dien has two children of his own of whom he holds full custody (Casper "Cappy" Robert Mitchum Van Dien and Caroline "Gracie" Dorothy Grace Van Dien).

Oxenberg and Van Dien are celebrity ambassadors for the non-profit organization Childhelp.

Anons, have you noticed the similar characteristics between all these organizations and the connected individuals we're seeing recently?

I'm trying to back up and look at them all from "40,000 feet", as it were, and see recurring characteristics:

1) psychological control over others

2) legal structure which avoids taxation

3) international business plan which has money crossing borders at least once and usually more

4) use of minors as chattel, whether for sex or as a "product" to generate revenue

Mostly recent, NXIVM with its Svengali-ish leader, the Turkish Fathullah Gulen and his organization, the Clintons/Obamas and their foundations and network, Howard Weinstein, Dan Schneider, and on and on.

The wrongdoing strikes me initially as being of equal interest to criminal prosecutors and the IRS, which has its own large and powerful law enforcement capacities.

So many people have died or had their lives ruined because of the individuals involved; I don't know how difficult it would be to prosecute the personal crimes.

Even without seeing actual org charts, which probably don't exist anyway, the organizational structures for them all seem similar: huge and baffling at first glance. Pic related is just an example.

I think what we're seeing is the new incarnation of organized crime for the 21st century - all of it using tax avoidance schemes, exploiting lax US non-profit corporation tax laws to keep the money flowing, and access to children as pawns for sex trafficking, blackmail, extortion, their own gratification, money from "clients", with all financial investments offshored and camouflaged under multiple benignly-named legal entities.

They know that setting up a myriad of structures will make their operations get lost in the noise.

At the same time am reminded of Q's words that hit me upside the head like a 2x4: "We have it all." Bill Binney confirmed that when he told us that the NSA was literally vacuuming up EVERYTHING. So it's not a matter of law enforcement and prosecutors finding out whether evidence exists, it's knowing how to subpoena a needle in a haystack.

Last night very late, I ran across a legal term that was new to me: a Klein Conspiracy. I'm not a lawyer, but this whole idea of a way to prosecute a huge organization in a simple and very effective way blew me away:

https:// klasing-associates.com/question/klein-conspiracy/

"Why does the IRS like to assert a Klein conspiracy?

The short answer is because it is easier. It is easier for the IRS to prove that a taxpayer made the government’s job harder than it is to prove that he or she actually committed a specific crime—and the IRS has discovered this much with its prosecution of “tax shelters.”

Lawfags– do you think the enigmatic Jeff Sessions might be following this line of pursuit?