Anonymous ID: 8e765c Looks like https://wearethene.ws/ is not working again! Feb. 11, 2020, 4:29 a.m. No.8100418   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0445

Looks like https://wearethene.ws/ is not working again!

 

This is happening regularly now. What's happening on the backend code to de-link the boards from the https://wearethene.ws/ feed??? I rely on this for my updates fairly regularly and also use it to post to NormieBook to red pill the masses. Please fix!

Anonymous ID: 8e765c Feb. 11, 2020, 4:47 a.m. No.8100500   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0508

>>8100445

>Are you aware that this site has been under heavy attack by "deep pockets" yesterday and last night?

Yes, I did see that information.

 

>Also, there are a number of other aggregator sites, listed in the OP, for you to choose from.

I did not know that. I will check those out.

 

Thanks, Anon. God bless you in your work. Carry on.

Anonymous ID: 8e765c Feb. 11, 2020, 5:26 a.m. No.8100678   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0767 >>0866 >>0963 >>1048

Senators: IG FISA Abuse Report Misled Public About Crossfire Hurricane

https://thefederalist.com/2020/02/10/senators-ig-fisa-abuse-report-misled-public-about-crossfire-hurricane/

 

Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson dropped that bombshell in a letter delivered to Attorney General William Barr that requested Barr declassify the information hidden in the redacted footnotes. While the declassified version of the Grassley-Johnson letter did not identify the four footnotes at issue, a detailed analysis of the IG report suggests the redacted information concerned Christopher Steele’s sources and potentially the FBI’s purported predication for the launch of Crossfire Hurricane. These conclusions come from a deep-dive into the IG report read in tandem with the Grassley-Johnson letter.

 

That letter noted that the senators had “reviewed the classified report of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) with regard to the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, and [were] deeply concerned about certain information that remains classified.” Their concern? “That certain sections of the public version of the report are misleading because they are contradicted by relevant and probative classified information redacted in four footnotes.”

 

The next sentence is the key, as it establishes that the redacted information concerns not just a few details addressed in the IG report, but goes to the heart of the entire Crossfire Hurricane investigation: “This classified information is significant not only because it contradicts key statements in a section of the report, but also because it provides insight essential for an accurate evaluation of the entire investigation.”

 

We Can Find The Footnotes With Those Breadcrumbs

>article then goes into great detail about footnotes, redacted info, etc.