>>8110234 lb
You are onto something here with Podestas, but posted too late to make it into notables
Good catch, can you put it into one graphic proof for a notable?
>some twatlarpers come up with a few good digs, then blow their wad on silly predictions, like they're controlled ops or something.
Observing the interactions over the whole time it seems that each person who "gets Q'd" whether here as anon, or on twatter is put to a test. The test is how they handle the attention - does anon brag about 'being Q'd', does the twitterfag take it upon themselves to become important and make predictions or otherwise believe their ideas/opinions are now 'blessed' or 'sanctioned' by Q? Or are the anon or twatterfag humble and behave with maturity?
It has been fascinating to watch who chooses what, how they handle it - some build themselves up (or puff themselves up) to an unrealistic level, ego takes over and they then either become bossy and know-it-all and then divisive (because as one of the Q'd, their ideas/opinions are clearly better than yours) with petty squabbles over minor differences, factions develop. On the other hand, others just appreciate the experience, take it in stride and carry on.