>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/02/11/the-dc-cover-up-thats-as-big-as-spygate/
Could somebody please post the article? I can't get the URL to load, nor am I allowed to view Sundance's almighty tweets.
That ego must be colossal.
>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/02/11/the-dc-cover-up-thats-as-big-as-spygate/
Could somebody please post the article? I can't get the URL to load, nor am I allowed to view Sundance's almighty tweets.
That ego must be colossal.
>>>8110784
>>NEON IS A PAYTRIOT AND TRAITOR TO THIS MOVEMENT
>Maybe so, but does that invalidate the facts of the statements?
I have said this repeatedly over the last year or so, ever since Giulio Occhionero's lengthy expose of Charlemagne.
Occhionero had been unjustly imprisoned (yes) for trying to expose the truth in Rome.
How on earth could he have known the most ideal American outlet for what he was saying?
Fortunately, Occhionero's English is excellent. There were still many voices of outrage that what he was saying was rubbish, simply because it was published on NeonRevolt.
I think it was a terrible judgement error.
The messenger is far less important than the message.
I understand your assessment about Neon Revolt.
What do you think about Giulio Occhionero's work?
A very fair point.
It's why I only took heed of what Giulio Occhionero was saying.
He could have published it on ICanHazCheezburger and I'd have paid attention to it.
This is turning into the same sort of debate as the Charles Ortel/Jason Goodman thing.
Not a Jason Goodman fan at all.
I tolerate him because he provides an outlet for Charles Ortel.
I listen to Ortel to learn more about the financial/tax/charity fraud aspect of the big picture.
Giuliani has mentioned RICO before, and I believe we'll see it come up again soon.
Will never be a Jason Goodman donor, but I appreciate the fact that he airs extended interviews with Ortel, who is absolutely peerless.