I wonder what percentage of Q followers have figured out that said expression is literal.
kek.
Funny how ah ha moments are had here all the time. This image just had the effect of of me mentally saying "cat got your tail," and immediately thinking, "no, that's now how it goes" and then immediately realizing it's "cat got your tongue?" and finally connecting/realizing why that timeless expression xists.
Well, I only understand things abstractly, and I'm just kinda fumbling thru learning comms as a go along, but I'll give it a shot.
Lets say the old TV show "Quantum Leap" describes a reality of sorts. If emergence into a "see at" person occurs (kinda like the 92/911 in your timestamp) and we call that 'x' (24 like the two 4's in your timestamp) then 'x' would be used "for tee-in" (kinda like the reversed last 2 digits of your post number–14) and we might call it a second eye/i (kinda like your "1115" makes 35, and the 35th letter is "i" the 2nd time around) and it would be reasonable to call that "see at" a "cat" and if we have "eyes on" that body as a "see at/cat" and control that body's actions, the "cat's got their tongue."
Reasonable?