>>8112601 pb
>theories mentioned having no real basis - their logic is that it must be so because we say it is so;
>
>don't think for yourself, just believe us.
it is similar to the debunking concept. Debunking = not actually disproven, but disproven because we want it to be disproven.
that's pretty weird. It looks like Obama and Bush were trying harder to pick their opponent if those numbers were right.
Obama sending Democrats to vote for Romney?
I'm not sure that's right, they don't have open primaries.
I thought the reason to use terms like that was to drive away people who just can't hear those terms.