>>810774

A trick of sophistry I seen before in this political crime research work is to claim "It is not proved"

That must be a real tried and true trick of mind control?

"It will be proved when this that and the other"

Total baloney and bullshit .

(Even after it's been proved over and over shills will claim this. This is a delay technique and works to delay and forstall any conclusion which would be necessary for us to demand reparations.

And the technique is also a comfort those who don't want to think about it nor to do anything about it.)

It you want to detail it out to make clear for everyone - that's our job. No problem.

But don't claim it's not proved, because it is.

I have already proved it to myself and so have thousands of other people / researchers.

[It 's a matter of philosophy as to what constitutes proof? However, in my experience you can't make anyone accept a proof. They must see it for themselves. ]

Along these lines I suggest the early parts of book " None Dare call it Treason" by Vincent Bugliosi.

He explains that to prove guilt you only need one thread of evidence.

We have many threads in this Hogg situation already.

[Plus the history of these simulations/ mis-directions, You can't believe this is the first, right?]

Including the vid I posted earlier of Hogg rehearsing.

Why would he rehearse?

There is no other answer except that he is an actor.

This essay covers important issues around our history governmental corruption and by implication the role of the News Media in supporting the crimes against our people, but does not go into the thinking and approach of a top prosecutor - Bugliosi, that I cited above.

I highly recommend the book version. This article is an abridgement

https:// www.thenation.com/article/none-dare-call-it-treason/

>>811711

Many people attest he came from Redondo and that he is older. There's even a vid where he's confronted in FL over the issue at that school.Parkland.

Do you really think the people who put together these shoddy events go to the trouble to pay witnesses and fabricate evidence just to? what ? make people who figure out what happened look bad?

They make people look bad with red herrings. But nobody who knows what's going on falls for it, since they've already seen all the other evidence.

The shills cherry pick what to "debunk"

Makes no sense. Nobodies paid people to say they knew him and he was older. If they had the money for that they'd pay for better actors.

Many people knew him in Redondo and wrote about it?

We even found Mugg shots of the guy that were immediately taken down. It was on a real site and I'm sure there are archives of it. As I've wrote thousands of people were onto this from day one.

You could actually track it all down by going to these places interviewing people - but still you'd have the clowns claim "It's not proved" and in any case - You don't even need this evidence to prove it.

They do this every time. It was done to the JFK researchers and had them running in circles for 50 fucking years.

There's still assholes who will repeat "But we'll never know" It's a joke.

Can anyone actually prove he's the age they claim. NO! because he's lying.

CNN making you all look like an idiot for claiming "It's not proved" kek

Also, at some point ya'll are going to be confronted with a whole list of the shit-hole banana republic Propaganda pieces done over the years. And then you might catch on to all the tricks used. And how shitty they are at it.

If you've studied other similar events you would understand the context.

>>811761

Nope. I'm from that area myself.