Anonymous ID: 63d4d8 Feb. 12, 2020, 1:16 p.m. No.8116402   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6423

>>8116357

It matters because what "Clear and Present danger implies." It implies that the news pundits are no longer protected by free speech 1st ammendment.

They are liable for espionage. They can be fined and jailed.

 

SAUCE

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_and_present_danger

 

https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/898/clear-and-present-danger-test