A MODEST PROPOSAL FOR ADDRESSING A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER
A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER
During both Crossfire Hurricane and during the impeachment proceedings, Democrats constantly and loudly proclaimed that corrupt political interference centered around Ukraine was an urgent threat to U.S. national security; that it represented a clear and present danger sufficient to justify maximal use of government branch powers for both investigation and enforcement, and declared it an emergency situation permitting minimal amounts of due process for the accused and broadly inclusive interpretation of criminal statutes in prosecution.
President Trump can’t just ignore these concerns, especially because millions of Americans share the same view, and it has put our country in a constant state of near-hysteria.
With his own acquittal behind him, and cleared of all collusion suspicion by the Mueller investigation, our president holds the unique position of being the only person in any of the three branches of government who has been thoroughly vetted.
The Constitution makes it the President’s duty to protect the national security interest and the law gives his office vast powers to use during times of urgent crisis.
Congress proudly stepped up to face the crisis with maximized use of power, but failed to solve the corruption issues by their own admission.
In the wake of that failure, and given an urgent national security threat, can the President let the American public see an executive branch any less fully committed?
The president can use his emergency powers and national security authority to lead the nation out of this crisis.
The argument for maximum effort has already been made — by both Democrats (and at least one ‘honorably bipartisan’ Republican): They informed us that this situation is too urgent and vital to national security that it can’t wait to be addressed at the naturally slow pace of normal government process.