Anonymous ID: 2224fe Feb. 12, 2020, 5:12 p.m. No.8119072   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Iowa Democrat Party Chair Resigns After Caucus Debacle

 

Troy Price, the Iowa Democrat Chair announced his resignation on Wednesday following the caucus train wreck.

 

The Des Moines Register reported:

 

“While it is my desire to stay in this role and see this process through to completion, I do believe it is time for the Iowa Democratic Party to begin looking forward, and my presence in my current role makes that more difficult. Therefore, I will resign as chair of the Iowa Democratic Party effective upon the election of my replacement,” Price said in a letter to the Iowa Democratic Party’s State Central Committee

 

The Iowa Democrat caucuses were a complete disaster.

 

The Iowa Dem party’s Hillary-funded app crapped out during the caucuses a week ago and no one is really quite sure who won the state.

 

Two days after the Iowa caucuses, partial, fudged results were released.

 

The Democrat Party says Pete Buttigieg, the Bernie bots insist it was stolen.

 

On Monday during the Iowa Democrat Party’s latest presser the Democrat sign crashed to the floor.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/02/just-in-iowa-democrat-party-chair-resigns-after-caucus-debacle/

Anonymous ID: 2224fe Feb. 12, 2020, 5:33 p.m. No.8119288   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9324 >>9402 >>9484

CDC Coronavirus Test Kits Distributed All Across America Found to Produce False Negatives Due to Failed Test Kit Reagants

 

Earlier this week, we reported how China rushed biotech industry virus testing kits into production, compressing the normal 2-3 years of testing and validation into just 2-3 weeks. The result? The test kits are a joke, producing 50% – 70% false negatives, which means people who have the coronavirus are falsely confirmed to be virus-free.

 

Now, the CDC is admitting that its own test kits which were widely distributed to hospitals and clinics across all 50 U.S. states, are also failing. They producing both false negatives (missed infections) and false positives (saying people are infected when they really aren’t), both of which lead to horrific errors in deciding who should be quarantined or treated.

 

“When states receive the kits, they verify that the kit works the same in their lab that it worked at the CDC. When some states were doing the certification, they found that the tests didn’t work as expected,” reports The Epoch Times.

 

This admission comes from Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the Center for the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, who we have previously profiled as a remarkably honest scientist working for the CDC. From the best we can tell so far, Dr. Messonnier operates with a surprising degree of transparency, given the total dishonesty of the agency she works for. Dr. Messonnier didn’t have to admit these test kits were failing, for example, and her rapid admission speaks to the level of transparency and honesty coming out of her department within the CDC.

 

“We hoped everything would go smoothly as we rushed this,” Dr. Messonnier explained. But things didn’t go as smoothly as they had hoped.

 

Put another way, Dr. Messonnier admitting these early errors in the testing kits actually gives us confidence that certain elements of the CDC might actually be willing to admit keep us informed with some degree of transparency. What’s suspicious is when government agencies tell us everything is perfect and nothing has gone wrong. That’s called propaganda, and that’s what’s coming out of communist China. So in a sense, Dr. Messonnier’s admission here actually lends credence to the CDC on all this.

 

These test kits produce false negatives that miss infected people

 

From previous reporting, it appears that hundreds of thousands of these test kits were sent out across America. Like many such test kits, their proper use requires careful following of the test procedures, including proper sample gathering (swabbing the patient), proper transfer of the sample to a liquid medium, proper labeling, proper adding of reagants, etc. Typically such tests require very precise steps for mixing, adding, shaking (vortexing), waiting, transferring to another container, and so on. Any failure to follow these steps can result in a failed test, and those failures can take many forms including false positives and false negatives.

 

The danger here, obviously, is that a false negative could lead to a local hospital or clinic believing a person is virus-free when, in reality, they are infected with the coronavirus and spreading it to others. That person could easily be allowed to return home (or to work) where they would spread the infection to others.

 

The rapid turnaround time of such tests does not make up for the fact that the test itself is producing false negatives. If you get bad results really quickly, they’re still bad results. In fact, a rapid test that’s inaccurate just results in doctors and clinicians making bad decisions more quickly, further accelerating the spread of the virus.

 

Video

https://www.brighteon.com/80928f50-05a0-44ef-bf97-cfe7cb64233c

 

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-02-12-cdc-coronavirus-test-kits-found-to-produce-false-negative.html

Anonymous ID: 2224fe Feb. 12, 2020, 5:36 p.m. No.8119331   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9402 >>9403 >>9415 >>9435 >>9461 >>9484

Democrats Attempting to Oust Barr to Prevent Release of Durham’s ‘Anti-Mueller Report’

 

As Democrats seek Attorney General Bill Barr’s removal following an about-face on Trump ally Roger Stone’s sentencing recommendation, one expert tells Sputnik the pushback may have more to do with the pending release of the Justice Department’s so-called “anti-Mueller report” than anything else.

 

Daniel Lazare, a journalist and author of “The Frozen Republic,” “The Velvet Coup” and “America's Undeclared War,” joined Radio Sputnik’s Loud and Clear on Wednesday to provide his thoughts on why the Democrats’ reaction to the DoJ’s Stone sentencing recommendation memo is about more than just the prison time awaiting a self-proclaimed “dirty trickster.”

 

Lazare told hosts Brian Becker and John Kiriakou that he believes Barr is “at odds with the ranks beneath him,” because “the bulk of the DoJ bureaucracy” is still in a “pro-Mueller,” Russiagate mindset.

 

“I think the DoJ and the local US attorneys went wild in this case and carried it way too far,” he argued, speaking of what he called a “draconian sentence” for Stone. At the same time, Lazare expressed that he does believe that Stone is a “dirty trickster” who needed to be “slapped down,” but not given a possible sentence of seven to nine years behind bars.

 

Being that Russiagate and the investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller failed to result in US President Donald Trump’s removal from office, “obviously a house cleaning is taking place in the DoJ,” Lazare contended.

 

All four prosecutors withdrew from Stone’s case shortly after DoJ officials told the media they were “shocked” by the sentencing recommendation prosecutors handed down.

 

Jonathan Kravis, who served as an assistant US attorney, and Special Assistant US Attorney Aaron S.J. Zelinsky took their withdrawals a step further: Kravis declared in a Tuesday court filing that he has withdrawn from his position at the DoJ and “therefore no longer represents the government in this matter,” and Zelinsky said in his withdrawal notice that he had “resigned effective immediately” from his role in the Washington, DC, US Attorney’s Office.

 

A supplemental and amended sentencing memorandum was later released by the DoJ on Tuesday, noting that the prior filing “does not accurately reflect the Department of Justice's position on what would be a reasonable sentence in this matter.”

 

Barr and the DoJ’s unusual intervention in the matter and the prosecutors’ resignations sparked outrage from a number of individuals, such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), who called on the DoJ to be investigated. Senator and Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) argued that the attorney general should resign or face impeachment from Congress.

 

https://sputniknews.com/analysis/202002131078300475-democrats-attempting-to-oust-barr-to-prevent-release-of-durhams-anti-mueller-report-/