Anonymous ID: e793c1 Feb. 12, 2020, 6:01 p.m. No.8119594   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9610 >>9631 >>9657 >>9662 >>9709

>>8119554

why do anons post mason memes?

right, bc it´s not anons, but clowns.

that is why they spend hours and hours into making bs nightshift memes that have no value to the Q movement at all.

that is why there are IDs saying "nightshift, yeah, nightshift" or "nightshift, are you there?" in the afternoon.

that is why those IDs try to divide into shifts when anons just drop buy to catch infos and memes whenever they can.

 

those clowns use that symbolism bc those cultists just have to use symbolism.

those are the ones posting propaganda (muh jew), slides (corona) and who attack other anons.

 

see the clowns.

see their desperation.

Anonymous ID: e793c1 Feb. 12, 2020, 6:03 p.m. No.8119611   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>8119559

you try to insinuate that I have to be a baker to find it quite shilly that baker did not fix that for two breads, even when reminded last bread?

is that what you try to say?

do I have to be politician to critizise them?

Anonymous ID: e793c1 Feb. 12, 2020, 6:08 p.m. No.8119666   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9695

>>8119610

sure, calling me the name of a former BV (that likely is still part of the clown crew, just like Fred Brennan who Ron still works with) is a great argument…when you cannot possible attack what I said and when you obviously did post a meme that shows symbolism that says cult obvious as fuck.

Anonymous ID: e793c1 Feb. 12, 2020, 6:24 p.m. No.8119837   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9902 >>9913

>>8119695

>>8119694

ok, I see you cult clowns really care about that symbolism thing.

obviously my trips 6 at :36 as 6th post made you butthurt and, more importantly, you think it makes other cultists butthurt.

that is why you posted with two IDs to give the impression that you still have control…that is also why you clowns aim at digits all the time and why an ID was so very happy that the two-ID-post worked that he had to post 4 times on that.

>>8119721

>>8119725

>>8119738

>>8119745

 

>>8119762

>Oh KeK is with me tonight!

 

quite pathetic.