dChan
Anonymous ID: 2d67a5 Feb. 13, 2020, 6:03 a.m. No.8123428   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3437 >>3448 >>3457 >>3512

NEWS

 

Rush Limbaugh ponders a Trump debate against Pete Buttigieg: 'What's gonna happen there?'

 

Rush Limbaugh on Wednesday suggested former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg wouldn't look masculine standing next to "Mr. Man" President Trump on a presidential debate stage because he is an openly gay married man.

 

Democrats are “sitting there, and they’re looking at Mayor Pete, a 37-year-old gay guy,” Limbaugh told his radio show listeners while discussing what he perceives as a weak Democratic field. “And they’re saying, 'OK, how’s this gonna look, a 37-year-old gay guy kissing his husband onstage next to Mr. Man Donald Trump? What’s gonna happen there?'"

 

Limbaugh said Democrats must be thinking, "despite all the great progress and despite all the great 'wokeness,' and despite all the great ground that's been covered," Americans likely still aren't ready to elect an openly gay man.

"What's gonna happen there?" Rush Limbaugh, right, asked his listeners Wednesday, referring to the prospect of a presidential debate between President Trump and Pete Buttigieg, left.

 

"What's gonna happen there?" Rush Limbaugh, right, asked his listeners Wednesday, referring to the prospect of a presidential debate between President Trump and Pete Buttigieg, left.

 

He added, "Can you see Trump have fun with that?"

 

Limbaugh's remarks sparked some sharp blowback on social media.

 

Limbaugh received the Presidential Medial of Freedom during Trump's State of the Union address last week, a day after he revealed he has been diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancer.

 

Buttigieg has not yet responded to Limbaugh's remarks.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/rush-limbaugh-suggests-pete-buttigieg-wouldnt-look-mascukline-next-to-mr-man-trump-on-debate-stage

Anonymous ID: 2d67a5 Feb. 13, 2020, 6:24 a.m. No.8123541   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3554 >>3980

>>8123437

>>8123512 me

Doing a related search for some images, I came across this from yesterday.

 

They're apparently feeling the need to deny the obvious.

 

A few selected snips FTA (full sauce below):

 

''A left-wing website, the Grayzone, has spearheaded the more tenuous theorizing around Buttigieg’s supposed CIA ties. A series of articles, which concluded the national security regime had “groomed” Buttigieg for power and which draw shaky ties between Buttigieg and the CIA, have racked up thousands of shares, especially from pro-Sanders Facebook pages. (The Grayzone notes that it does not directly allege Buttigieg is himself a CIA asset, but it does plenty to suggest it.)

 

In fairness, Buttigieg’s own past offers material for conspiratorial pickings. At the consulting firm McKinsey, Buttigieg helped advise on grocery pricing for the Canadian grocery giant Loblaws—a company later implicated in an industrywide price-fixing scheme for bread. McKinsey has also been a favorite contractor for the CIA, although that work was more about reorganizing the agency’s bureaucracy than rigging elections.

 

[…]

 

The conspiracy theories swirling around Buttigieg appear to be mostly trying to explain away the rise of a centrist Democrat, with a relatively hawkish foreign policy, in a primary that has otherwise tilted leftward.''

 

https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/02/12/pete-buttigieg-cia-asset-coup-latin-america/