(Reposting for morning anons). Good morning.
Q (coup -https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1197727653228425216 coup_img.png ).
Asks: How to introduce evidence legally:
*Facts that do not need to be proven.
(a) admissions; ( That is what Biden did. )
(…);
*Facts that need to be proven by a witness.
*Facts to be proven by a document:
(a) documents offered to show that something was done or said;
(b) documents offered for the truth of their contents.
Who has everything? Rudy. I even think FBI raided Rudy to collect his evidence on Biden and Burisma Holdings. Think logically.
Methods which info collected/Obtained? (commonsense3.png).
Witnesses reached out for RUDY. That's why its OFFICIAL.
Admissible by the court of law? Yes, *Facts that need to be proven by a witness.
Also:
"In order for the evidence to be useful to you in your closing argument, you have to have it admitted." ( That is what Biden did. ).
Why are we here?
To present a case and building public support and awareness:
"By the time to get to trial, you will want to be thinking about the
narrative that you need to play out for the Court and the factual matters you need to lay down,
and the order in which to lay them down, to build that narrative.". So Q(coup) is basically HUGE presentation on building case against deep state and/or Coup Cabal (Bribed by Qatar? Why SA is important? Why SA was priority? To stop the flow of money. ) .
AND THANK GOD.