Anons,

I think I have a very juicy read for you.

Why does Q put things in [brackets]?

I know we know it as a killbox, but what exactly does that mean?

What's its purpose?

What about the markers? [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]

To understand what I'm going to hypothesize, you need to first understand how secret societies work.

How do you connect multiple players over space and time around the same ideological, and social goals?

That's in effect what secret societies like Skull and Bones, Masons, and even fraternities and other 'fellowship' programs do.

They instill their members with symbols, handshakes, 'secrets' and other connecting pieces of information.

When a new inductee gains access to this information its as if an entire world of information is revealed to them.

They can begin to see, understand, and act within the meta framework of the symbols each ss provides.

Q and the great awakening are very similar to this. We're a secret society that's turned itself upside down.

It's private, but very public. In order to participate you need to lurk to even understand the language, and the metaphors used.

It's a very cohesive group of people rallied around various symbols that have sprung from the groups collectivization of intent.

And that intent has been to seek truth.

And Q has exploited that but giving us just that.

Truth. Encouragement to pursue what we already knew.

That the world is controlled through these meta systems of fellowship, these secret societies.

Well Q aims to replace them.

Don't believe me? How would you know an anon in the world if the internet went down tomorrow?

If you're an oldfag enough, if you've been around well before Q you know what our fall back is.

4 of clubs.

Just an example. Look at winning back pepe with peepee, look at all the closed pools, look at gamergate and what it did to us.

We've created a culture that no one can understand. We're the modern day Navajo code talkers lol.

It takes time and effort to put forth the effort to understand anonymous chan culture.

And that acts as a filter of sorts to make sure the casual and the simps don't spoil the pool.

So back to the markers.

We've been digging Q drops for almost 3 years now.

That means we have 3 years of experience digging the individual drops. Focusing on each one and pulling the relevant data and connections out that we can.

But what about the meta?

What is meta? In a word, it's transcending.

Information that in the singular represents an entire set of data that informs. Obfuscation of the individual for clarity of the collectivized.

I believe the [killbox] is just that. The metadata for the collective drops spread through time.

So lets try to prove this:

[1] first occurs with drop 498 on 7 Jan 2018

On that date there were several drops that use this marker, and most of them appeared to be working to establish a proof with POTUS twat.

But this being the first year for use of markers, it appears Q is attempting to establish the players in the classified investigation that can't otherwise be talked about.

drop 524 establishes that

[1] = Hussein

[2] = He who has no name

[3] = HRC/BC

[4] = NP

With that established, drops going forward can have names subbed for the markers.

Drop 718 implies that [1] Hussein targeted those 71 souls that died on the Russian plane crash.

Q then goes on to explain that [1]Hussein had a source that was used for [2] Mcstain. Is there someone on that plane that connects Hussein and Mcstain?

The next instance of [1] occurs with drop 740 on Feb 11 2018.

It implies that prisons are being created and prepared to hold those arrested.

[1] Hussein to be arrested?

Well, drop 1068 goes on to say day [1].

We know from other drops that the first arrest will set the tone for everyone.

Considering the 2018 use of marker [1], who would that imply is the first arrest?

The next drop, 1376, implies that [1] Hussein made a speech, a speech that resulted in the 187 of someone.

Who was that someone? What is the other meta data of that drop? That drop was about the death of Officer Familia.

This is the first time there's a real actionable item we can go seek to prove this.

When did Officer Familia die?

What speeches did [1] Hussein give around that time frame?

Anything anomalous about it? Any code, symbols or references that would imply a go order to murder the police officer?

Why was the police officer murdered? (Wiener?)

I'll leave you with this one note:

I believe the markers change from year to year.

For 2018 the markers established the players 1-4. Then they expanded on the player's activities through the year.

My next post will discuss the 2019 markers.

And then finally the disturbing 2020 markers.

If I'm even remotely right, we're in for quite the show in the next few months.

>>8123419

Using this analysis as a basis,

drop 2524 implies that [2] was completed in 2018.

Who was [2] supposed to mean?

Mcstain?

Was he completed in 2018? lulz.

In the same drop Q then says [1] incoming.

That means the new set of drops for 2019 was incoming.

Drop [1] for 2019 then occured a few months later on March 9 2019 with drop 3004.

So now lets establish what the markers are:

In drop 3004 Q comes out and drops markers 1-4.

I believe this is expanding on the previous years metadata relevant to 1-4 (Hussein, Mcstain, HRC/BC, and NP).

In that drop we have:

[1] where the meta data of the drop imply that Rod Rosenstein is a player in the investigation of [1], hussein.

[2] then goes on to state

>clear vision for the @DOJ

>hold offenders accountable

>advance the rule of law.

Do you believe the timing is a coincidence?

How to handle [2] Mcstain, did it give the DOJ a clear vision on how to handle these power players? Did it hold an offender accountable? Did justice prevail?

My God I think this is working. These markers are metadata that inform the other uses of the marker.

What about [3] in that first drop of 2019?

Well, [3] HRC/BC in this drop was a link to a twat saying

>Sean Hannity “people will be held accountable” as new evidence surfaces on multiple fronts.

Are we waiting with baited breath for HRC/BC to be held accountable?

This theory is holding true the more I look into it.

What about [4] NP?

The linked twat discussed Goodlatte, a member of the house judiciary committee. Certainly relevant to NP at the time no?

So moving forward through the drops for 2019, does each marker inform on the big 4?

[1]Hussein

[2]Mcstain

[3]HRC/BC

[4]NP

I think this is working anons.

Need help pulling data from the 2019 drops.

But I've already did the 2020 drops…

We're in for a ride, boys.

>>8123489

>>8123419

Anons,

You need to find the markers on an annual rolling basis.

Each year starts with a new set of markers informing the previous year's metadata.

In effect, for 2019, we need to find each marker [1]-[whatever] in 2019.

Now here's the hard part, once you find the marker you need to look at the surrounding and relevant drops as if they're a magic eye, figuratively.

You need to pull the metadata for the drops surrounding each marker and paint the picture.

Reveal the point the drops are trying to make about the marker.

As I showed in the last post about drop 3004,

It was the first use of [1] for 2019.

It basically esablished the status of the previous years markers 1-4.

Now go forward and backwards in the year and find the other markers.

When Q implies [] is the killbox, that means it's metadata relevant to particular markers established in other drops.

So for example in drop 3004

[1] Hussein is dropped in the same section as [RR].

Does that imply [RR] is the metadata point relevant to [1], where [1] is Hussein who is the actual kill target?

[] is a killbox, but that within is not necessarily the thing to be killed.

It's the meta data that informs the actual metadata.

>>8123539

Basically is what I'm seeing here.

My body is ready.

>>8123539

>>8123419

Lets do a proof for ourselves.

In 2018 Q used [1] with the Officer Miosotis Familia murder.

The implication from the other [data] in that drop was that there was a speech put on by [1] Hussein that activated the [187] attempt on the officer.

So lets find it.

The murder occurred on July 5th 2017.

My guess is [1]Hussein put on a speech for fourth of july.

Can we find it?

Well I'll be. He made a big political speech on July 3rd 2017. https://archive.is/ft02I

Can anyone find that speech?

BIG BIG BIG anons. Find the speech. Watch it.

Did [1]Hussein call for the murder of Officer Familia?

>>8123538

To expand on 2019s set of drops,

drop 3050 has [1] and [2].

[1]Hussein is implied that it's not just about sex trafficking.

Sex Resort (non_temple_resort_only), nontemple resort means Zorro ranch in NM, epsteins resort that didn't have a temple.

What did [1] Hussein do at that resort?

Q implies he trafficked & drugged underage girls.

I wonder what Hussein has to say about his time with Zorro.

What about [2] HRC/BC?

The drop implies HRC and BC participated in Occult / Worship of Evil (temple) [CLAS 1-99]

Haiti

Pray for the victims.

The catalog of drops coorelating [2]HRC/BC with Haiti holds true.

I'm almost certain this method of sharing metadata, sharing classified data without outright saying it is being used by Q and POTUS.

Names that ARE NOT markers are the metadata that informs about the marker.

For example drop 3178

[attempted coup] is the metadata that informs [1] Hussein's killbox from the same drop.

Looking at drop 3178 as if it's a figurative magic-eye, what are the key points you can pull from it?

[1] Hussein [attempted a coup] of the United States of America.

What do we know about who backs [1]Hussein?

HUMA? bin Talal?

Did SA attempt to overthrow the US?

Who was the first to go in the great happenings?

National Guard and the likes in SA? Down they go?

Anons. I'm almost 100% that this is an entire set of metadata activity that we've completely missed. Keep going with this method and bring back the truth.

My 2020 breakdown is coming. I'm almost not willing to post it because the implications. I dont' want to raise fear especially if I'm wrong.

Maybe some anons can help me.

When was the first case of marker [1] in 2020?

What was the metadata wrapped around marker [1] in 2020?

What was the main subject matter of most of the post?

>>8123695

Can anonyone find when Obama was in New Mexico?

What about Epstein?

Any correlation?

Any connection?

Maybe anons can ask Obama outright on twat about how he feels about zorro?

>>8123711

I am [1] with the nigger-faggots.

Heh. See what I did there?

>>8123710

I am [1] with the nigger-faggots.

Heh, see what I did there?

>>8123725

I'm retarded, wrong (you)

>>8123419

Okay anons.

I think we've proved this meta-data, 'magic eye', method of comms is holding true.

So lets start looking at drops with [1]Hussein, [2]Mcstain, [3]HRC/BC, and [4]NP.

Drop 3764

From December 2019.

Want to know what this is all about?

The metadata is as such:

DNC Servers

Crowdstrike

Ukraine

"In-Hand" (think usb drive)

[1] Hussein ALL OVER this drop.

"How does one provide content to WL?"

How did Crowdstrike find the Intended target?

Through Bulk Data Collection.

Which required the Highest level of authority.

The implication of the metadata is as such:

The DNC servers in Ukraine? data was taken in hand with a USB drive.

The data was provided to WL person-to-person, implying the intern for the DNC was the culprit.

Was SR death a sting by [1]Hussein to root out a leak?

The use of crowdstrike to find the intended target of the leak was with the use of NSA level bulk data collection.

Which required the highest level of authority, being [1]Hussein.

So obummer found seth rich by using crowdstrike and NSA data to find the culprit.

Then [187]

>>8123730

Anons,

Not to be crass but this is an important example of how to use the metadata method of handling information.

Anon asked if I've talked to the voat goats about this method.

I responded with the fact that I am 1 with the nigger-faggots.

The actual content of the sentence says one thing, but the metadata piggybacks off it to make a statement about [1].

>>8123771

In this thread alone I've provided countless examples of drops that hold true to the fact that markers 1-4, at the very least, are

[1]Hussein

[2]Mcstain

[3]HRC/BC

and [4] NP.

Do it yourself. Search on qmap.pub for "[1]" and look at the set of posts as a whole, not one individual post.

Expand your analysis to span posts and tell me that [1] doesn't refer to Hussein.

>>8123773

Correct.

That post also has [2].

Do the linked stories correlated to [1]Hussein, and [2]Mcstain?

Look at each news story with each of those goons in mind and tell me if you can pull some interesting tidbits?

>>8123801

Let me help.

Essentially Q established in 2018 that 1-4 within the [killbox] are related to various players in this struggle.

Go back to the original post I made in this thread.

Then look at the one you just linked to.

Basically Q established that

[1] marker is = Hussein

[2] is Mcstain

[3] is HRC/BC

and [4] is NP.

These markers are used as placeholders for those players, and then in OTHER Q posts the metadata of the post, the GENERAL information you can pull from the post informs the correlating place holder.

So when you look for all the "[1]" posts Q has made, the rough idea he's trying to make in each post expands on the story of what [1]Hussein did, what is going to happen, and how big of a traitor he really is.

This allows Q/POTUS to make drops without actually saying the clas info outright.

Anons,

Using this metadata/Marker method of building the story, painting the picture,

can we dig through the Q drops to embellish further on who the rest of the markers are that we've seen?

So far we have:

[1]Hussein

[2]Mcstain

[3]HRC/BC

[4]NP

PLEASE do not trust me. Do the search yourself. Look for "[1]" and read it as if every instance of [1] in a q drop will inform you further on who [1]Hussein really is.

Do the same for [2]Mcstain. Admittedly there aren't a lot of [2]s lol.

and the same for [3]HRC/BC

And [4]NP.

Now I ask,

Who is [5]?

can we figure out who [5] is by using the metadata for every Q post that it shows up?

I think so.

Give it a try.

>>8123933

I think that's the next step.

We were given 1-4 by Q.

1 = Hussein

2 = Mcstain

3 = HRC/BC

4 = NP

5 = who?

and so on.

Then we take those names and look at the Q posts as a whole and build the network map connecting them all.

>>8123905

So the linked article under the [2] is about a congressional candidate (Debbie Mucarsel-Powell) with financial ties to Ukrainian oligarch Kolomoisky.

The implication is that Mcstain fits in here somewhere.

Who is Debbie Mucarsel-powell?

Who is her husband?

Are they connected to Mcstain?

I suspect the deeper we go the more we'll have to dig to reveal the connection.

Anons,

Lets figure out who [5] is.

The most notable Q post using this marker is post 705 which simply says [5].

On Qmap it implies Shanghai Pudong International Airport E5 Terminal.

If I remember correctly there was a picture of the Terminal, which isn't showing up on Qmap.

So [5] = something to do with china.

My first thought: is there someone who's a power player in the US who ALSO is connected to China?

I think we all know who that is.

I suspect [5] is Diane Feinstein.