News is dynamic these days.
Anon posted this last bred:
>>8127346 Rand Paul on Senate Floor (4FEB2020): YT removing videos mentioning Ciaramella
Link to vid that worked an hour ago no longer works, kek. Nice job, YT – yer payin' attention.
>irl has doc
good to know, but really too bad if true
he's been steady with 11-2am
means earlier baking for me
and less coverage on gy
OR
spotty coverage earlier
but evenings take priority
bc Q may post them
(even if Q posts in gy, it's slow enough to manage – and a rare event)
any would-be bakers, now is the time to step up plz
doc covered about 6 hours a day, moar some days
really need your help, everyone
o7
>>8128205 United States Led Entire World In Reducing CO2 Emissions In 2019
notable
hilarious!
talk about a dank headline……
So you maintain the spreadsheet. Bravo!
Hope someday to know how to archive with more proficiency.
Great to have all the different archivists able to check things by comparing results.
When baking, fakes are always a problem. Totally appreciate efforts made to expose them, thank you so much.
Also for the education, o7.
>>8128234 Alabama Democrat proposes bill mandating all men have vasectomy at age 50 or after third child
notable yikes!
what about in-kind donations?
This news is from NOVEMBER
Just found other stories, e.g.:
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/34087-vindman-admits-he-made-up-elements-of-trump-zelensky-call-summary
NOV 30 2019
Don't remove anything, baker. They're fine, damn faggots are never satisfied. And i don't mean anons, i mean the nasty ones. Eff'em.
I use ZH and GP all the time, they are mostly decent sources, although GP is a "thin" source but usually not inaccurate. kinda like breaking news 911 on twatter – all u get is a bare minimum. but ok for hot stories.
gyb here
every baker is different, provides slightly dif. info
i like saying whether vids are a clip or longer and giving the length, for example, most don't
key thing is getting the stuff out there
I provide sauce source if it's really controversal (Sorcha Faal), really perceptive (Sundance), or both (Neon Revolt).
Don't usually provide sauce for MSM, except when it's directly salient to the story
(Ok–now i expect to hear back from anons who say they would never cite one or more of the above, kek)
>short and sweet descriptions
FANTASTIC
especially when anons do original analyses
which is when bakers almost never get them, kek!
don't know whether it's true in this case, but seems like there's been a lot of stuff posted recently that's old, deceptive, from bad sources, etc. great shilling technique, but the board catch most of it.
wish i could post pina coladas on the beach
like being on voat, kek.
oh great - now my electricity is flickering
storm outside