So, if Q's Corona drops are about spy satellites, or technology, information, communication, etc.
Might the corona virus be about the same thing?
Are they worried about a health virus or trying to continue a spying technology under the guise of a virus health scare.
They let in some 'experts', but not the best health experts?
Why did Q even tell us about the Corona satellites?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corona_%28satellite%29
The Corona[1] program was a series of American strategic reconnaissance satellites produced and operated by the Central Intelligence Agency Directorate of Science & Technology with substantial assistance from the U.S. Air Force.
The Corona satellites were used for photographic surveillance of the Soviet Union (USSR), the People's Republic of China, and other areas beginning in June 1959 and ending in May 1972.
>Huawei's big plant is in Wuhan.
notable, considering the coronavirus stareted there, supposedly
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuhan
While Wuhan has been a traditional manufacturing hub for decades, it is also one of the areas promoting modern industrial changes in China. Wuhan consists of three national development zones, four scientific and technological development parks, over 350 research institutes, 1,656 hi-tech enterprises, numerous enterprise incubators, and investments from 230 Fortune Global 500 firms.[24] It produced GDP of US$224 billion in 2018.
> an outbreak that the World Health Organization is calling a global emergency
a global emergency but China won't let health experts in to help
>There are a significant number of people in the world, under the 5'9" mark,
would you want a sub full of 6'4" men or 5'4" ?
how about tanks?
John Brennan….first arrest?
>Durham scrutinizing John Brennan’s handling of Russian interference in 2016
CNN was framing the story as Trump was directing Barr to find dirt on Brennan
>Durham interviewed agents and analysts from all three agencies, and the report said he was scrutinizing whether the clash over intelligence sharing was the typical sort of bureaucratic turf battle over jealously guarded secrets or an effort to cover something up.
>It was Brennan’s still-classified “wake-up call” intelligence that prompted the Obama administration to reconsider how it viewed Russia's hacking of the Democratic National Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee revealed last week. The specifics of the intelligence which jolted Obama's national security team into action is detailed in a blacked-out section titled, “[Redacted] Intelligence Was The ‘Wake Up’ Call.”
I am leaning toward Brennann because of this Q post and CNN was talking about Brennan being a target for most of the day yesterday.
Why would they be focusing on Brennan being the big target of Trump unless they got wind of a leak that we are not aware of yet?