I don't see why Wikipedia footnotes would be used because anyone can edit that website.
I know, but the idea came to me recently, and your post reminded me to share it. Q referenced Wikipedia articles a few times, but in regard to subject matter for us to read. I think things like editable Wikipedia footnotes and cryptic Q messages wouldn't be a good combination. In my opinion, sometimes things are added to the notables that don't belong or are added prematurely.
act as in behave, speak, or interact naturally or normally. They seem groomed.