Anonymous ID: c37777 March 27, 2018, 6:44 p.m. No.814089   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4127

>>813962

>earths magnetic field is powered by the berklin currents between us and the sun.

I have extensively reviewed the EU theory, and have not been convinced about that aspect.

The mainstream representation of a rotating core is horridly inaccurate, once you understand it is a "torriod" flow (river of sorts) trekking at the center mass of moon and earth (if pushed together as one mass - there is a point underneath the surface of earth that would have "zero gravity"). This point correlates with admission and results about "the core".

Dragging around like a rotor in a motor/generator it creates a current also, within earth. Resulting in a field of magnetism.

 

Apply the theory to actual observation. You will find it applies more accurate than secondary currents from sun, because if the sun's mag field was inducing it would vary much more greatly, and center would align with sun instead of moon.

See what you think- check into it.

Anonymous ID: c37777 March 27, 2018, 6:56 p.m. No.814207   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4224 >>4252 >>4257 >>4287 >>4348

>>814127

I need to re-research this to ID the exact ones but there are a few planets which are "upside down" so to speak with poles in comparison to the sun. If berklin (induction) occurred, this would be in sync.

That's what prompted me to alternative ideas re:mag fields.

That was years ago, so my sauces are hard to find.

It will bother me enough that I may dig new sauce, but not tonight. I am beat for thinking today!

Anonymous ID: c37777 March 27, 2018, 7:05 p.m. No.814298   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4316

>>814224

Thanks anon. o7!

I remember when I first came to the theory, I was wanting to contact the EU researchers and hash it out with them, but am an anon at heart even back then and did not want to reveal myself when I knew CIA and "big evolution science" was trying to silence the EU information.

Instead of going batty about it, I just set it aside and over time lost info and forgot which direction some planets rotate even!

It was a research hobby of sorts for a few years when I was bored. Was >10years ago.

I may have just renewed my desire, and with the change of climate in liberal suppression of facts coming, the theory may be debated openly one day soon.

Anonymous ID: c37777 March 27, 2018, 7:11 p.m. No.814353   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>814316

>SAFIRE project

Not familiar (with the new results).

Since moving to offgrid lifestyle I sort of bailed out of research for a more simple life.

Mostly because I wanted to remain anon in real life. (why I like this place)

Anonymous ID: c37777 March 27, 2018, 7:15 p.m. No.814380   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4449

>>814348

I knew someone would have it handy here!

The rotation of some do not match the majority, and observing the magnetic field of those oddballs was the anomaly.

Over 10yrs ago when I observed this research, willing to bet it is still the same, but it's my old forgetful mind that has changed.

Anonymous ID: c37777 March 27, 2018, 7:34 p.m. No.814559   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>814449

Venus was one that had near zero magnetic field.

I had a shit of a time finding a "magnetic field" comparative data chart for the solar system.

If anyone has one handyโ€ฆ

 

The key research concept was to observe Mag fields that correlate to moons, size and strength of field vs moons.

compare:

Against planets having no satellites (moons).

and positions from Sun - if sun was said to be the cause then mars should be stronger mag field than earth- it is near zero also if I remember.

 

This begs for an explanation other than currents induced from sun to be the cause of magnetic fields. โ† that was observation

Anonymous ID: c37777 March 27, 2018, 7:41 p.m. No.814613   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>814576

 

My wife said similar long ago, she also suggested his chair and voicebox are remote controlled. What a fun toy he was for someone who wanted to get a message outโ€ฆ

(I think my wife nailed it.)