>>8145997 lb

>>8145319 lb

>>8145731 lb

Just a thought, but could the substitution of 5 dots instead of three (standard ellipses) correspond to 5 dots on recent Q posts (remember the countdown theory anons posted during this last week WRT to dots at the end of Q posts?)

May correspond, may not, just throwing it out there.

>>8146187

>>8146219

>>8146154

If you are going to repost Q, please include post number / "drop" number, time & datestamp please. Otherwise it's confusing and can be seen as deceptive by some. I'm not accusing you, just letting you know how it can be seen.

Thank you.

>>8146279

Thank you - you are an extremely important member of the team. I appreciate very much you doing your part and we all count on you, without you this will not work!

o7

>>8146323

Thank you MarketUpdateAnon. Interesting as you've mentioned care.com before (extremely suspicious outfit) and I'm still baffled at how Crowdstrike is "worth" so much.

>>8146327

PLEASE, AGAIN, CITE Q WHEN YOU REPOST Q'S POSTS.

>>8146370

It is indeed an honor and pleasure!

o7

>>8146375

PLEASE CITE Q WHEN YOU ARE REPOSTING Q'S POSTS

Post # / Drop #

Date/timestamp

It's not that difficult

>>8146403

All true - it seems to me that many of these are not meant to make money, just to either squeeze out any competition or to launder money / get access (or give access) to data.

>>8146415