Anonymous ID: c04c98 Feb. 15, 2020, 9:42 a.m. No.8146182   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Ok guise, why in the hell would any dim wavy HRC as their running mate, they know more about her crimes than the general public, they’ve got to know they will be suicided is they were president and she was VP, if she ever got in the WH the world is doomed. That’s why I’m almost sure she will be taken down before it’s possible for her to jump in. An anon asked in 1/2chan what prison is HRC?

 

The answer from the insider, “her mind”!

 

Why are they crazy enough to consider HRC as a running mate? She has dirt and bad dirt on all of them. But still, they’ve got to know they’d never serve the first year as president with her as VP.

 

Are they insane or blackmailed?

 

How did Bloomberg amass his fortune? Not from the shifty Bloomberg news. Has any anons dug into his wealth and where it came from.

Anonymous ID: c04c98 Feb. 15, 2020, 9:50 a.m. No.8146251   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6354 >>6382

65 Per Cent of French Believe French Civilisation Will Collapse

 

A survey released by polling firm Ifop has claimed that more than six in ten French people think that French civilisation as we know it will collapse.

 

The survey noted that a third of the people who believed in the collapse. think it will occur in a brutal fashion and put the time frame for the collapse within the next 20 year or so.

 

One of the chief reasons stated by respondents as the prime cause of a potential collapse is climate change, with 27 per cent stating that climate factors and overconsumption will spell the end for French civilisation, French media outlet L’Aisne Nouvelle reports.

 

Around 15 per cent of the respondents said that mass migration would be the cause of the collapse, while another 14 per cent stated that internal conflicts within French society, or even civil war, could precipitate it

 

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/02/15/65-per-cent-of-french-believe-french-civilization-will-collapse/

Anonymous ID: c04c98 Feb. 15, 2020, 10:49 a.m. No.8146682   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Full Transcript of ABC Bill Barr Interview Shows Most Content Not Included In Broadcast Interview

__Another good example of why to read the transcript—

Not exactly surprising, but late last night ABC released the transcript of the Bill Barr interview. A review of the transcript compared to the broadcast shows there was significant interview material left on the editing floor.

—Approximately two-thirds of the interview was never broadcast. Additionally, major sections of answers were completely cut out (chopped up/edited) after the question(s) was/were asked.

—Below is the full transcript of the interview (including parts not broadcast), and the full, raw, 25 minute video of the interview:

—ABC NEWS CHIEF JUSTICE CORRESPONDENT PIERRE THOMAS: General Barr, thank you for your time.

—ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL BARR: Thank you.

—THOMAS: This is the first time we’re hearing from you since the Roger Stone story erupted. At minimum, there appears to be an appearance problem. Trial prosecutors recommended 7 to 9 years on Monday evening. The president tweets at 1:48 AM Tuesday morning calling the recommendations – quote “horrible, unfair and a miscarriage of justice.”

—Then word comes out from DOJ headquarters Tuesday morning that the recommendations are too severe and suggests a lesser sentence is more appropriate. Four of the trial attorneys resigned from the case. One of them quitting the Justice Department altogether.

—What happened, sir, and what was your role?

BARR: Well, as you know, the Stone case was prosecuted while I was attorney general. And I supported it. I think it was established, he was convicted of obstructing Congress and witness tampering. And I thought that was a righteous prosecution. And I was happy that he was convicted.

—The issue then became the sentencing. A new U.S. attorney had just started in Washington D.C. and the week before the filing, he engaged in conversations with senior staff here who raised some questions about the sentencing because he was concerned that the so called guidelines, the sentencing guideline formula, was indicating a sentence between 7 and 9 years.

—Which, he felt and all of us immediately felt was very, very high and excessive in this case. And so he wanted to discuss that and over a number of days it became clear that the prosecution team wanted to recommend to the judge, and by the way, sentencing is a function for the judge and not the Department of Justice, we’re not the decision maker. But they wanted to advocate for a sentence that was, at the top, between 7 and 9 years.

—And, in those discussions here at the department, you know, I came to the view as my colleagues did that I wouldn’t support affirmatively advocating what I thought was an excessive sentence.

—THOMAS: You wanted to do that from the outset?

—BARR: Yes. And then point out different features of the case that she should consider if she wanted to go below the 7 to 9 years. And I won’t get into the wires on that, but there were a lot of, I think, very legitimate arguments to be raised, there are points to be raised there. But at the end of the day, we deferred to her. Or, and that was what the approach was, I thought, we were going to take.

—THOMAS: So the US attorney for the District of Columbia signed off on, his name is on the recommendation that went in there.

—BARR: Yeah.

—THOMAS: How did that happen?

—BARR: On Monday, he came by to briefly chat with me and say that the team very much wanted to recommend the 7-9 year to the judge. And, but he thought that there was a way of satisfying everybody and providing more

—THOMAS: So you were surprised?

—BARR: I was very surprised. And once I confirmed that that’s actually what we filed, I said that night, to my staff, that we had to get ready cause we had to do something in the morning to amend that and clarify what our position was.

—THOMAS: So you’re saying you have a problem with the tweets?

—BARR: Yes. Well, I have a problem with some of, some of the tweets. As I said at my confirmation hearing, I think the essential role of the Attorney General is to keep law enforcement, the criminal process sacrosanct to make sure there is no political interference in it. And I have done that and I will continue to do that.

—And I’m happy to say that, in fact the president has never asked me to do anything in a criminal case. However, to have public statements and tweets made about the department, about our people in the department, our men and women here, about cases pending in the department, and about judges before whom we have cases, make it impossible for me to do my job and to assure the courts and the prosecutors in the department that we’re doing our work with integrity.

 

Full transcript below

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/02/14/full-transcript-of-abc-bill-barr-interview-shows-most-content-not-included-in-broadcast-interview/