The solution for that is to do something that benefits the board. Do research & post results. Make or post a meme on current topic. Pray! Encourage anons. Teach something that you know. Learn something new. If you don't enjoy what's here, change it. You have the power.
Complainfags are dividerfags.
That's right, retweets don't have a time/date. If you want the date on a retweet check trumptwitterarchive.com
Feb 15, 2020 07:38:08 AM RT @PaulSam27131285: THIS IS HILARIOUS Mayor of Georgetown in the US excused himself to go & use the washroom in the middle of a meeting &… [Twitter for iPhone]
>>8144734 PBPBPB at 2020-02-15 15:57:26 (UTC+1)
Muh thoughts on the hilarious fart video.
Everyone who ever wore a mic is now thinking, I wonder who overheard something I didn't want overheard
Everyone who ever did a bad thing is recalling, I wonder who has the video of when I did so and so
Reminder to Deep State that "we have it all"
Also,
Forget about political correctness! If something is funny, it's funny, and the POTUS doesn't have to be pompous and pretend not to be a normal person who finds it funny
Teaching people about free speech. Nothing has to be self-censored because we think it might offend someone
AND
*** That mayor must surely be dirty and have some dirty secrets – and now he knows that We The People know
Dig target?
-
Also normies who want more "funny videos" might search for open mic or hot mic and they will find the famous open mic video of Obama promising the Russian foreign minister that he will be able to do more 'after the election'.
POTUS is trolling the Deep State.
qresear.ch
search on ace2
>>8143763 PBPBPB
This lab is at most 20 miles from the wet market where the virus had been assumed to have jumped from animal to human. However the idea that a Chinese lab could have a viral sample escape is well-documented - as mentioned, one lab in Beijing has had four separate incidents of the SARS virus leaking out accidentally.
Notably, the first three known cases from early December had no contact with that market, and roughly one-third of the initial exposed cohort had no direct ties to Wuhan's wild meat market, the original presumptive source of the virus. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/wuhan-seafood-market-may-not-be-source-novel-virus-spreading-globally
Since its discovery, scientists have been unable to fully determine the zoological origins of 2019-nCoV, it was initially thought to have passed through snakes, but now all that's agreed upon is that it's mostly bat in origin. This inability to derive an exact zoological source is exactly what would be expected if the virus had been artificially engineered to target humans as UNC already has, this doesn't prove an artificial nature - but it is consistent with one.
A full-genome evolutionary analysis of 2019-nCoV published in The Lancet concluded, "recombination is probably not the reason for emergence of this virus" https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30251-8/fulltext
since it seems that the Wuhan Strain isn't a mosaic of previously known coronaviruses, but instead draws from distant, discrete parts of the coronavirus family tree - not how these viruses naturally evolve. Because even mixing and matching coronavirus genomes from every known mammal, scientists couldn't find any possible combination that would explain those regions of the Wuhan Strain's genome. The Lancet muses that a mysterious animal host could still be out there, however since they've already searched through every known possibility and been unable to find a match, another obvious explanation is that bio-engineering accounts for the inexplicable regions of the Wuhan Strain's genome
Perhaps most notably, a genetic analysis of the spike-protein genes - https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/01/30/on-the-origins-of-the-2019-ncov-virus-wuhan-china/
the exact region that was bio-engineered by the UNC lab in 2015, where Zhengli Shi and Xing-Yi Ge previously isolated a batty coronavirus that targets the ace2 receptor just like this 2019-nCoV strain of the coronavirus does - indicates an artificial and unnatural origins of the Wuhan Strain's spike-protein genes when they are compared to the genomes of wild relatives. Instead of appearing similar and homologous to its wild relatives, an important section of the Wuhan Strain's spike-protein region shares the most genetic similarity with a bio-engineered commercially available gene sequence that's designed to help with immunotherapy research. It is mathematically possible for this to happen in nature - but only in a ten-thousand bats chained to ten-thousand Petri dishes and given until infinity sense.
- Early research found that 2019-nCoV targets the ace2 receptor, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.20.913368v2
which is found in East Asians at roughly five-times the rate of other global populations, indicating that the Wuhan Strain 2019-nCoV was likely developed as part of a gain-of-function defensive project possibly linked to immunotherapy or vaccinations - never meant to leave the lab, but meant to serve as a Red Team to fight back against, not as an offensive weapon since the virus is likely wired to be much more virulent among Asian populations. Further support for this is the fact that the Wuhan BSL-4 virology lab was already actively looking into the risks posed from bat coronaviruses, and actively researching coronavirus treatments - by definition both of these projects would require live virulent strains of coronavirus.
Cite the statutory authority for your assertions.
What about 42 USC 289?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/289g-2
42 U.S. Code § 289g–2. Prohibitions regarding human fetal tissue
(a) Purchase of tissue
It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any human fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects interstate commerce.
(b) Solicitation or acceptance of tissue as directed donation for use in transplantationIt shall be unlawful for any person to solicit or knowingly acquire, receive, or accept a donation of human fetal tissue for the purpose of transplantation of such tissue into another person if the donation affects interstate commerce, the tissue will be or is obtained pursuant to an induced abortion, and—
(1) the donation will be or is made pursuant to a promise to the donating individual that the donated tissue will be transplanted into a recipient specified by such individual;
(2) the donated tissue will be transplanted into a relative of the donating individual; or
(3) the person who solicits or knowingly acquires, receives, or accepts the donation has provided valuable consideration for the costs associated with such abortion.
(c) Solicitation or acceptance of tissue from fetuses gestated for research purposesIt shall be unlawful for any person or entity involved or engaged in interstate commerce to—
(1) solicit or knowingly acquire, receive, or accept a donation of human fetal tissue knowing that a human pregnancy was deliberately initiated to provide such tissue; or
(2) knowingly acquire, receive, or accept tissue or cells obtained from a human embryo or fetus that was gestated in the uterus of a nonhuman animal.
(d) Criminal penalties for violations
(1) In general
Any person who violates subsection (a), (b), or (c) shall be fined in accordance with title 18, subject to paragraph (2), or imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.
(2) Penalties applicable to persons receiving consideration
With respect to the imposition of a fine under paragraph (1), if the person involved violates subsection (a) or (b)(3), a fine shall be imposed in an amount not less than twice the amount of the valuable consideration received.
(e) DefinitionsFor purposes of this section:
(1) The term “human fetal tissue” has the meaning given such term in section 289g–1(g) of this title.
(2) The term “interstate commerce” has the meaning given such term in section 321(b) of title 21.
(3) The term “valuable consideration” does not include reasonable payments associated with the transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue.
Yep.How ya doin, fren?
What's the hassle, fren?
Anon is frenly.
Anon looks for info and shares it freely.
Some anons don't like to watch videos – too time consuming compared with text.
It's hard enough to keep up here without dropping off to watch a video.
So chill out, mkay?