You know how Q says to keep tract of resignations and stuff?
Are we supposed to find out like what the real reasons are
eventually? Is it because of the whole satanic rituals?
MeToo mayhem like what this article is sorta pointing
to as the reason? Did he like say what and why?
I don't think Q said anything regarding what was going to happen to them. Just to keep tract. So, I don't know about the going to jail part. Obviously, with the kind of money they're getting with leaving, they're gonna continue to live their cushy life. I was just wondering if Q had said anything about whether reasons would be revealed and if some were into the SRA stuff, maybe those would end up in jail. Don't know.
But did Q say we'll find out what happened exactly? Like which CEO from which company did what to whom?
Whoa! Anything "out of the ordinary" as the reason? Looking back, could you find something that might like allude to some fishy-fishy? Changed-out by force? Enticement? Highly suggested? Selfie-imposed?
kek
thanks for this.
just took cursory look.
these are the "public" reasons for
resigning, will we find out the
true and "actual" reasons, you think?