>>8159229 (lb)
>spreadsheet
>our archives are harmonized and ACCURATE
https://qmap.pub/read/3637 & https://qmap.pub/read/3638
https://qanon/pub/#3637 & https://qanon/pub/#3638
There's quite a number of more examples for lack of accuracy & "harmonization"….
Dude, I think you're trying to sell your product a little above price.
>Apples/Oranges
You're clearly a dumb faggot, too dumb to afford to be lazy for sure.
Why don't you just go take a look before you sit down to shitpost?
<cue "your dumb broke the cat" meme here.
>our archives are harmonized and ACCURATE
Don't care how much work it costs, when I can find inaccuracies with a simple one-liner on a command line in less than 5 mins.
For example in raw-text_2:
Thu 16 Aug 2018 13:10:00 is EST during DST when the rest of the file is respecting daylight saving.
Mon 10 Sep 2018 15:35:16 appears twice, with the second time being Tue 11 Sep 2018 15:35:16, or as a last example
Sat 15 Sep 2018 00:19:00 actually was the 16-Sep-2018 00:19:00 (unixtime=1537071540).
Found more errors … just telling you that claiming (in bold) accuracy & "harmonization" sounds ridiculous given these errors, and shows you're either taking yourself to serious or haven't done your job good enough.
>Compare versus archives or actual posts that are in the top of every bread since long ago
You seem to be so smart, I have to spell it out for you, just so you might learn something:
None of the archives that are in the top of every bread since long ago are accurate.
You'd better lurk moar and post much less of your useless drivel, or do the work of checking yourself. I have.
(you've signed your post correctly, btw.)
>Go ahead and make a list of all that anon's inaccuracies and send it to him.
No thanks. You do it.
Next time don't claim "harmonization" and accuracy in all caps. That's all.