Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 16, 2020, 11:50 p.m. No.8161630   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1646

>>8161571 (pb)

(LONG chain begins pb… all connected…}

 

For me, Q3849 is a marker that it's going down NOW, but understanding why is convoluted.

Better to use it as hook for elucidation of how comms build on comms, over and over.

Garish blue graphics are from last summer, whenever Anon posted Scavino pool pic. Once I realized what was up, I rushed to get it done "in time" (even though I figured there was an even chance it was just more disinfo…)

Look carefully and figure out what I did. Even in that graphic already many comms are building on comms.

Anons had caught relevance of Q314 to DS pic, and it hit me: 3/14.

Michael Anton had posted two connected articles on 3/11 and 3/14 that mirrored the dates 2/11 and 2/14. (No idea why PST time in book tweet… likely copied from board and never corrected until much later.)

(That was all apparently a trap for the evildoers, who seem to have pulled the NZ FF attack in response. Neon Revolt posted an article summarizing my posts on this but I never read it, thinking I shouldn't inflate ego…) Anyway, I didn't catch those Anton articles until later. On 3/14 I was frantically trying to figure out how to use GIMP as I thought it was going down on 3/15 and needed a graphic….

 

So Q314 -3/14. Look at the "break" between 3/11 and 3/14. Found relevant article with video and music. Graphic shows I matched the music in the vid to POTUS "correction".

Of course, disinfo. By that time I had been "taught" that failed "predictions" get "corrections", and this time I tried on my own, using additional POTUS tweet, so second graphic.

 

So.. Oasis "Wonderwall" marked in mind as nice comm. Jump to December. Preparing massive set of posts, and POTUS RR tweet triggers. (Had subsequently used Q476 in belated graphic on POTUS July 4 speech…) Resulting RR-out graphic is very terse, requires Anons to fill in steps. But THINK. EACH step makes sense on its own, right.

 

(Last pic is first comment on Q3849…. sometimes you need a little humor!)

Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 16, 2020, 11:53 p.m. No.8161646   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1659 >>1720

>>8161630

These people are SICK.

Do you think I check every POTUS timestamp in military time (or anything close)?

If I told you why I paid particular attention to these… actually maybe you can figure it out if you read all the posts.

These people are STUPID.

Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 17, 2020, midnight No.8161683   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1720 >>1727 >>1734

>>8161670

Originally was going to make much more complicated graphic, but felt like big 'chore', too 'forced' and out of place. Have much better big graphics elsewhere…

Why not strip it down and explain?

There are five POTUS RT's of the 2:17 vid. They came early in huge tweetstorm that started just before midnight. The DS vid came in same storm.

Was going to use Q615, Q1116, Q117. Why? Think. Many "clever" "back connections" but too clever, some already used, and didn't mesh overall.

On separate angle, wanted to somehow use DS vid since [looney] in Q3588.

Screencap with GW pic cut text at "That's all…" so had idea to combine, and cut extras.

Why was each vid capped at EXACTLY given spot?

Graphic is only useful if Anons study carefully, so why not just leave out all lines? The "missing" connections are obvious if you look, but the graphic only works if you think about bigger picture. Many graphics in other post chains are like this, leaving things out.

Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 17, 2020, 12:13 a.m. No.8161734   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1742

>>8161683

Think this out.

Q seems to repost a previously posted pic, obviously changing the filename to highllight recent catches…

Anon catches an anomalous ID…

Does the ID lead somewhere interesting?

Was "this" pic posted on interesting days in the past?

Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 17, 2020, 12:22 a.m. No.8161768   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1773 >>1780

>>8161762

Think this one out after watching video.

Cruz often good for comms… smart, funny…

Vid cuts to Cruz oddly, and he opens highlighting Q keyword 'force'.

Both linked Q posts relate. (Graphic kept simple by not 'forcing' that issue here…)

Double POTUS tweet same day uses 'stuff' (= 'force'?).

Delta checks out: 1st BOOM is one of four.

Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 17, 2020, 12:39 a.m. No.8161840   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1843

>>8161828

The graphic illustrates how known comms take on new meanings in light of other comms.

 

Q specifically highlighted the fact that a state funeral was on Dec 5.

So after that, a state funeral reference can be a D5 marker.

 

I have repeatedly used the NO! move in recent graphics, so Q can figure that I will make the move to state dinner.

 

The original MOAB/red carpet rollout posts served to identify the given picture as the "picture" of Q2347. I had that picked out long before I realized it was supposed to be a meme. But once it becomes the Let's Roll! meme, that in turn adds to the meaning of "rollout" and likewise to D5.

 

Why did I choose exactly that filename? (easy)

Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 17, 2020, 12:42 a.m. No.8161849   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1861 >>1892

>>8161843

Graphic should make sense, provided you think.

Consider:

Overt content of Q3820 not so relevant here? Q3820 already used above in "comms" post?

Q posted "old" article. A clue?

Multiple "moves" used in graphic. THINK for yourself.

Basic grasp of Flight 93 comms needed, but already posted above.

He who laughs last, laughs best.

Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 17, 2020, 12:59 a.m. No.8161908   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1914

>>8161901

Does the graphic make sense on its own?

Does it require any external assumptions?

Independent evidence?

Graphics/posts meant to hang together, but also to be TESTED individually.

 

Like other graphics, cut in middle from: https://pixeldrain.com/u/N89MRLsR

Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 17, 2020, 1:04 a.m. No.8161930   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1938

>>8161917

Less is more!

How much could be done with deltas and timestamps here… but does it make the graphic better?

Q even shit the bread next and got a "nice" delta with 3rd vid post, but it's a trap.

Trust yourself.

And TY memefag! Excuse to post that again justifies ~2 hours "wasted" on crap graphic…

Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 17, 2020, 1:10 a.m. No.8161946   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1955

>>8161938

Can you verify that the graphic makes sense as it stands?

Can you find further connections?

Easy one: what pic was posted on Christmas Eve?

I marked a few points of interest.

Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 17, 2020, 1:36 a.m. No.8161993   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1999 >>2001 >>2005

>>8161963

This is basically a reminder that FOLLOW BOLTON is linked to Anton's departure from the WH, for reasons that seem spurious.

Perhaps a crucial marker?

Now heading into the endgame…

 

(This is post #70 in a chain continuing from /pb/… WINNING SOON!)

The Flight 93 Election!

(Michael Anton is Q, and the Fake News Media KNOWS, but it's a TRAP!)

They didn't DOX Q, and NOW they're gonna GET IT!

(If they REALLY thought Q/POTUS were evil, why didn't they expose?)

Now they are FUCKED!

Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 17, 2020, 1:42 a.m. No.8162005   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2009 >>2012 >>2018

>>8161993

First graphic meant to be simple. Posts elsewhere elaborate.

Next two from just before shutdown.

Before that, tried to "catch" Q/POTUS humor, or "add" humor to "decode" graphics.

Why do THEY fear humor?

Why are memes so important?

Anonymous ID: 5ce19b Feb. 17, 2020, 2:02 a.m. No.8162060   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2066

>>8162056

The first graphic could have some connection lines added, but I don't see the point.

The obvious connections are obvious, and the more subtle things require you to LOOK and THINK anyway.

 

The second graphic goes with the first, but I added a different Q post.

Some graphics are intentionally left a bit cryptic like this. Unless you dive in and VERIFY the connections, you aren't liable to get much.