dChan
Anonymous ID: 2fe35e Feb. 17, 2020, 7:22 a.m. No.8163147   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3192

>>8163128

Interdasting….

i started the Information Warfare thread here a year ago and it also got deleted by BO/BVs despite pleas to save it. Still exists as an archive and short thread, but never got it really up and running again because of August deplatforming. Put it on /qrb/ so it wouldn't get deleted again.

see https://8kun.top/qrb/res/22979.html

Anonymous ID: 2fe35e Feb. 17, 2020, 7:27 a.m. No.8163187   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3207 >>3274 >>3275

>>8163152

baker fren, glad to see you.

Happy Presidents Day!

I could do one bred but better not to, gotta go back for a nap soon (then wake up for "real morning" later).

 

Question: the links for 10448 are not working. i know i've seen this problem before but don't remember what causes it. do you?

Anonymous ID: 2fe35e Feb. 17, 2020, 7:42 a.m. No.8163290   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>8163192

The BV's on Meta mocked me for trying to save that thread, said they "might" save it although it was full of "garbage" (or words to that effect). It was bumplocked for a while and then one day - just gone!

 

It wasn't full of garbage, it was full of diggs refuting "muh Russia" and flowcharts showing the interactions between the Muh Russia players, see CAP.

 

Have done a little digging trying to bring the Atlantic Council into the picture but developing flowcharts requires a lot of time or more anons who are interested. See CAP. This chart is quite primitive right now–but could become part of the larger chart if there were the time and manpower available to pin down the relationships.

 

Right now, am pretty busy baking, especially now – we're short on bakers. But mapping the disinformation network remains a passion.

Anonymous ID: 2fe35e Feb. 17, 2020, 7:51 a.m. No.8163342   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3441

>>8163275

well that would be my bad, because i put those colons there. did the title real quick at the end. but that's a bizarre factor, isn't it? if that's the problem can request BO to take out colons, it can be done.

 

>>8163332

colon theory not holding, eh? how about multiple commas? i'll try that one out in /comms/ and get back

Anonymous ID: 2fe35e Feb. 17, 2020, 8:05 a.m. No.8163441   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>8163332

>>8163342

when i got to comms, saw your test - which also covered commas since you used the same title

That title worked fine in comms, no problem citing the links from the bred with the same title in a different bred.

 

Conclusion:

It's not the title that's the problem

Anonymous ID: 2fe35e Feb. 17, 2020, 8:20 a.m. No.8163545   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3675 >>3677

>>8163491

well-said. good people can find themselves in evil situations–sometimes they are even there to help others to get out. or to provide an opportunity for evildoers to choose good, which happens i think more often that people realize. labels like "good" and "evil" are for actions, not people. just my 2cents worth.