Anonymous ID: 4211dd Feb. 17, 2020, 7:14 a.m. No.8163114   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3153 >>3155 >>3200

Anons,

I've been going back to Q drops and looking at them with a meta analysis.

In summary, I'm finding each [marker] and assuming they're a sealed indictment.

Q's recent post 3862 with [possible unseal(s)-declas] in the killbox leads me to believe he was confirming what we were working on last Thursday and Friday (pics related).

If each marker is a sealed indictment that POSSIBLY could be released, it led me to believe that anons are the tool that will be used to pry open the declas.

That is to say: we need to make the connections and push the narrative that each unseal creates.

Q and Potus will NOT unseal these indictments cold turkey.

When you go back and look at the Q posts with this type of approach, the severity of the corruption and treasonous actions becomes clear.

It's bone chilling.

Read pic related for the qrd, but the more we dig into this the more I believe we're on the right track.

 

Every time I find something profound I report back here to you anons.

So what did I find today?

 

4-10-20

 

One of the earliest stringers that anons always believed meant DJT.

But if you go back and start looking at these markers in the way previous described,

does it become plausible that the intent is to substitute 4, 10, and 20 with their respective indictments?

The good news is [4] was essentially given to us.

[10] can have an educated guess applied to it,

and [20] is pretty easy as well.

 

So lets identify these markers:

in Q post 524 Q lists 4 different markers and correlates them to specific names and bank accounts.

Among the names was [4] and the implication that [4] is to refer to NP.

Nancy Pelosi.

 

[10] is a bit more obfuscated, but I believe we can make a reasonable guess:

Post 364 references "Dark [10]" along with post 365 referencing "dark" and "darkness" among the clear text.

Other references that make me think [10] is who I think it is: "Special Place" in drop 365,

In the same drop "Q/POTUS -" and a string of numbers occur. "[10]" only shows up next to Q/POTUS - 4.

My thought is they're implying a connection between [4] and [10] indictments/players.

So who is an evil, dark player with relevance to "special place" and connections to [4] NP?

I believe [10] to be Soros. And if you take the content of 365 for what it is: [10] Soros was arrested at the ATL airport.

Q did say it was a big big arrest.

 

Okay, onto the last marker [20].

Marker [20] shows up explicitly within the context/confines of the FISA investigations on Carter Page.

As found in the following Q posts:

1794

1816

1928

1929

1974

FISA FISA FISA

So what do all these posts imply? 1 of the 4 signers of the FISA warrants is highly relevant.

And if the theory is correct, that FISA warrant signatories would appear to have a connection to [10] george soros (remember, [4] [10] [20]).

Most importantly, drop 1974 states: What will the [20] FISA 4th warrant disclose?

 

So who is [20]? And why are they important to the 4th FISA warrant?

Who signed the 4th FISA warrant?

None other than lover-boy Peter Strzok.

 

So, for your approval anons,

[4] [10] [20]

really means:

[Nancy Pelosi] [George Soros] [Peter Strzok] are connected.

Next post I'll explain how.

Anonymous ID: 4211dd Feb. 17, 2020, 7:23 a.m. No.8163153   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3193

>>8163114

Pic related is a graphical description of the DJT connections I'm seeing. I've only just started to dig.

 

Basically lets start from 20 and connect to 10.

 

If [20] = Strzok,

Peter Strzok's sister appears to be Jill Strzok.

Jill Strzok works with Thomas Blasey

The brother of Christine Blasey Ford.

Who's attorney during the Kavenaugh confirmation was Debra Katz.

Who is a chair for the Project on Government Oversight,

Which is funded by the Open Society Foundation.

Notoriously a [10] Soros front.

 

Now [10] to [4], assuming [4] = NP:

Soro's activities in Ukraine connect back to Paul Pelosi Jr's exploited with the energy companies NRG Labs and VISCOIL.

And of course Pelosi Jr. is the son of Nancy Pelosi.

 

So what does this get us?

I believe it's going to be our first indictments that are revealed. Strzok, then Soros, then NP.

This will set the tone for the coming indictment unseals which will include [1] Obummer.

Go ahead and read the Q posts with [1] markers in it.

Tell me that doesn't enrage you?

If this is proven as a method of analyzing Q, we're off to the god damned races and we really have it all.

 

Because anons will then push the idea that [1] Obummer worked with/planted Bradley Manning into the Mil in order to undermine them through Wikileaks.

The [1] markers ALSO imply that Obummer allowed CROWDSTRIKE (think trump transcript) to access NSA bulk data collection.

Does that put their name into perspective? Is CROWDSTRIKE a tool for the dems to attack those that threaten them?

Say, a leaker? Someone who downloaded data to a USB then GAVE IT TO WIKILEAKS who is almost CERTAINLY under surveillance by Crowdstrike?

Don't DNC payments to Crowdstrike line up with a particular DNC death of note?

Did Crowdstrike reveal the leaker, and Obummer kicked down the chain to Noodle Hair to hire MS13 to ASSASSINATE a PANDA?

 

Can you begin to see what is going to happen?

 

The logical NEXT QUESTION is WHY did they do that? What was in that data that warranted, in their minds, such an action?

does Q imply the [+insurance] files from WL reveal the entire 16 year plan to destroy america? (He does).

Do you anons have those insurance files?

Are they backed up offline?

Are you ready?

Anonymous ID: 4211dd Feb. 17, 2020, 8:05 a.m. No.8163437   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3458 >>3462

>>8163389

Why did BO pardon Bradley Manning?

How was Seth Rich discovered?

If he took data by USB, is it more likely HE was under surveilance?

or the outlet he leaked to, Wikileaks?

Considering Bradley Manning and Wikileak's relationship, and BO's pardoning of him…

Considering the damage Bradley Manning did to the US Military, and the adversarial stance between Mil and Obama admin…

Is it realistic that Wikileaks was under surveillance by the Obama Admin?

Through NSA? I suspect not considering Bradley Manning…

Who else has all the info though?

CROWDSTRIKE?

Did Obama give CROWDSTRIKE access to bulk NSA data collection?

Did they find Seth Rich?

Did they notify Obama on this?

Did he send it down the chain through Clapper and Brennan?

Eventually to DW "Noodle hair" S?

MS13 activated?

IF THIS CAN BE PROVEN, or SUPPORTED BY Q/POTUS through DECLAS,

Would that be a HUGE FUCKING PROBLEM for Obama?

Why did trump harp on Crowdstrike in particular in the Ukraine transcript?

What does CROWDSTRIKE MEAN?

In context of crowdstrike having access to bulk data collection?

Does/did Crowdstrike HAVE IT ALL?

Would that allow them to STRIKE at those that threaten the Ds the most?

Such as the CROWD?

Who is the CROWD?

The people?