As I understand it, 'asking the question' effectively ends the game. Trump can't legally deny Q if he's connected to it and acknowledgement of Q as a real phenomenon has massive, immediate implications. It means that everything said in Q's posts will need to be verifiably proven beyond a shadow of a doubt in the public realm. Which is exactly what WE want and exactly what THEY don't want. Hence why they haven't asked, he has them TRAPPED.
Quite funny, no?
Quite suspenseful, isn't it? If he denies it or declines to answer, it would be disappointing beyond words. But what if he DOES answer? If the MSM is so hellbent on making articles attempting to disprove Q, why haven't they just asked him directly? What's the hold-up?
We're trying to fight an honest war in a world full of sociopaths who thrive on plausible deniability. Goading them to confront Trump directly and watching them shirk back in fear is beating them at their own game. He has a gun to their heads and begging them to pull the trigger, like the cyberwarfare equivalent of Russian Roulette.
I suspect eventually, someone like Hannity WILL be used to ask the question. They won't pull the trigger, they're too much of cowards. Q has alluded to this before.
>They're so incredibly stupid, they don't realize that they're running two narratives that are completely counter to each other: the first being that Bill Barr is POTUS' waterboy, and the second that Bill Barr and POTUS are at odds. Can these both be true?
It says to me that they're so desperate to make something stick that they don't care about contradicting themselves, even if it's two articles by the same person side-to-side.
And that's REALLY desperate XD