Q…
What is "The Q" to be asked?
Let's do some logic.
Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How?
I'll jumble it around a bit.
How?- Will it be done in person? Will it be done via tweet? Will it be done under oath? Written testimony? Via livestream?
Who?- This is a twofold question. It's not just about who the question is ask to; but also who's doing the asking. Will the person asking be a journalist? A guest on stage? A prosecutor? Likewise, who is answering the question, assuming they're able? Trump can claim that all he knows about it is what's been reported in the news, but he's insulated on purpose.
Is Trump going to "ask" Military Intelligence about it? A lot of people assume it's going to be a reporter. It could very well be a DNC Candidate who puts the question out there on stage when talking about the "terrorist threats from right wing conspiracy theorists", especially if/when Antifa kicks back up and their actions need cover/justification… to be answered by "the Administration", perhaps.
Or maybe Trump asks a rally audience: "I keep hearing about this Q character. Do you know who Q is?!". The whole place would lose it, in the best of ways.
Where?- The setting is important. Could be a slick 2 second thing that comes with a "didja catch it?", or it could be as loud and as public as possible. Is it in a private setting? Did Schiff ever ask about Q in his SCIFs? Perhaps it seems to innocently happen in an interview?
Does it happen on the boards? Is Q waiting for someone to ask "THE right question" here on the boards? On twitter?
'''When?"- Strategically, when would be the best time to do this? Before the election? During a debate? End of the week? After Assange is out of Belmarsh? After a victory? During "something" else as an attempt to compound and conflate separate issues?
Before or After Trump sends out the "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us……." tweet?
Why?- What's the purpose of… whom… asking… something… in the first place? Is it in an attempt to use Q against GEOTUS? If it's an attack, it would need to be before the elections because it's kinda far too late afterwards… unless they'd try to use it to delegitimate the elections/whip up their soy army for one final push? Makes more sense to weaponize any possible relationship before the election, and possibly with a similar timing to Podesta's e-mails being released.
If it's a positive reason… To what end? Confirmation? Celebratory? "Now that we've freed America from the Party of Corruption, it's time to level with you…" But then… it'd probably be rather moot after THE tweet. I think "positive" scenarios would be more mundane and nonchalant if anything.
What?- What iiiiiiis The Q that triggers the D5 of information, confirmation, declassification, and all of our other wildest "it's habbening!" dreams? If all the previous questions culminate to a point… what is the question?
"Mr/s. Y… Did you order the assassination of Seth Rich?"
"Mr. Wray, are you aware of a right wing conspiracy called Qanon and if yes, what are you doing to combat it?"
"Tonight on Hannity/Anderson 360, I ask Don Jr about the photos of him with Q supporters."
"Mr. Scavino, this panel asks if you have been involved with any official activity related to Q Anonymous. How do you answer?"
Or maybe The Q is an answer.
MSM: "Mr. Presidents, can you explain why the Q "crumbs", as they're called, seem to significantly align with your tweeting habits?"
DJT: "Do you believe in coincidences?
Is Vegas known as a place where one WORKS for their money?
#ThatsMyFetish