Anonymous ID: 1e63bc Feb. 19, 2020, 6:06 p.m. No.8189269   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9497 >>9640 >>9745 >>9868 >>9937 >>9948

'''Bill Barr Eyeing Facebook, Google Immunity For Users Posts"

https://www.oann.com/u-s-attorney-general-questions-need-to-shield-big-tech-from-liability-for-user-posts/

 

>Lawmakers from both major political parties have called for Congress to change Section 230 in ways that could expose tech companies to more lawsuits or significantly increase their costs.

 

>Some Republicans have expressed concern that Section 230 prevents them from taking action against internet services that remove conservative political content, while a few Democratic leaders have said the law allows the services to escape punishment for harboring misinformation and extremist content.

 

>Barr said the department would not advocate a position at the meeting. But he hinted at the idea of allowing the U.S. government to take action against recalcitrant platforms, saying it was “questionable” whether Section 230 should prevent the American government from suing platforms when it is “acting to protect American citizens.”

 

>Others at the meeting floated different ideas.

 

>The attorney general of Nebraska, Doug Peterson, noted that the law does not shield platforms from federal criminal prosecution; the immunity helps protect against civil claims or a state-level prosecution. Peterson said the exception should be widened to allow state-level action as well. Addressing the tech industry, he called it a “pretty simple solution” that would allow local officials “to clean up your industry instead of waiting for your industry to clean up itself.”

Anonymous ID: 1e63bc Feb. 19, 2020, 6:21 p.m. No.8189450   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Just love watching these Democrats knowing that they probably believe that their only chance to keep themselves out of jail is to win the nomination. The desperation is real.

Anonymous ID: 1e63bc Feb. 19, 2020, 6:28 p.m. No.8189538   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9570 >>9596 >>9641

If Bill Clinton was C_A, then Pete Buttigieg is C_A. I remember the '92 election, where Clinton came in out of nowhere and defeated Bush Sr. and Ross Perot. The first time I saw Bill Clinton in a debate, I knew he was going to win–he was just so much smoother than either of the two. Pete Buttigieg is the same way.

 

My guess is that Buttigieg will be our target for this election, whether he wins the nomination legitimately or not.

Anonymous ID: 1e63bc Feb. 19, 2020, 6:31 p.m. No.8189591   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Hah, my youtube feed of the Dem debate got cut-off 30 seconds before POTUS' speech started (violation of terms of service).

Anonymous ID: 1e63bc Feb. 19, 2020, 6:42 p.m. No.8189733   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9753

>>8189698

I voted Clinton. I was young and stupid; after Reagan's example, I thought the most important thing in a President was charisma. Character wasn't even a consideration.