sauce? That's not the title of the news article, and it doesn't show it's been updated according to the update stamp
https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/10/politics/bernie-sanders-pete-buttigieg-essay-accidental-rivals/index.html
sauce? That's not the title of the news article, and it doesn't show it's been updated according to the update stamp
https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/10/politics/bernie-sanders-pete-buttigieg-essay-accidental-rivals/index.html
Definitely funny, 100% agree, but also fake.
>8192352 (You) Buttigieg & Sanders face-off in fight neither saw coming
baker
It's my post, but i don't understand why it's notable. Someone posted an edited title to the article and i was just questioning it because it looked fake. It's a 10 day old article
You can leave it. I honestly didn't even read the article, I just wanted to find it because the fake headline posted was hilarious and I hoped it was real.
Hmmm…After CNN and the left media tries to trash barr regarding intervening on the stone sentencing recommendation, they are now admitting that Barr was correct in his actions. Unexpected from CNN.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/19/opinions/barr-got-it-right-on-stone-opinion-schultz/?hpt=ob_blogfooterold
vid link, won't let me embed
https://pmd.cdn.turner.com/cnn/big/tv/2020/02/15/was-stone-sentencing-recommendation-too-harsh.cnn_3080259_768x432_1300k.mp4