>>8192087 PB

Meta-killbox anon here,

This recent Q posts linkes Epstein and Wexner to the term [Darker].

We've seen darker, darkness and dark used before for marker [10].

I've theorized that marker [10] equates to the sealed indictment for George Soros.

Go back and read all the drops with [10] in them and tell me if you agree.

For those who missed it last week, the theory goes as such:

each [marker] such as [1],[2],[3] etc.

represent a sealed indictment or clas item intended for declas.

The markers are interconnected, and the info within the [killboxes] informs on those connections.

If you take the killboxes and the metadata, the general subject and data points, of a Q post, add them together and they inform you on each marker.

We started discussing this means of reading Q posts last Thursday and Friday. On Friday Q posted another post with [killbox] data:

Post 3862 contains: "[possible unseal(s)-declas]"

It felt like, to me, that Q was confirming that the markers are unseal/declas items. We were speculating they were references to individuals, but being actual indictments makes more sense in context of this Q post.

So either way, Qs last post had [Wexner] and [Epstein] in brackets, along with [darker].

Go back and read the darker posts. Go back and read the context of each post. Do so while looking at the SET of posts as a whole that refer to dark, darker, and darkness.

Who do you think is [10]?

What is [10] important?

Because 4, 10, 20 of course.

What if instead of DJT it's really [4], [10], [20].

Those markers, I believe, are [Nancy Pelosi] [George Soros] and [Peter Stzrok].

From left to right that would be a higher power player to a lower power player (Stzrok).

If you flip it though, "think mirror," Stzrok leading to Soros who leads to Pelosi would be a great way to kick off the indictment unsealing bananza.

Stzrok is connected to Soros, who is connected to pelosi through her son's actions in Ukraine.

I wonder, is Q implying that Wexner and Epstein are connected explicitly to Soros somehow?

What is the meta data in this recent Q post?

Victoria's Secret.

I can tell you that through the MONY building in NYC where victoria's secret is headquartered you can get to the founders of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

So there's 2 degrees of separation from VS and the NCMEC.

Some digging on soros and victorias secret would be due.

>>8193827

To embelish a bit on Stzrok and Soros

[20] Stzrok's sister Jill Strzok works with Thomas Blasey, the brother of Christine Blasey Ford

Blasey Ford accused Kavenaugh, using Debra Katz as her attorney.

Debra Katz is the Chair for the Project on Government Oversight, which is an Open Society Foundation funded operation.

That of course gets you to [10] Soros,

Who through activities in Ukraine is connected to Paul Pelosi Jr.

Getting you to [4] NP

>>8193858

And what would you think would happen to the view of the Mueller investigation and the Impeachment efforts if NP was indicted?

Would that blow up any credibility they have?

It would move quickly to the corrupt FBI and DOJ that lead to these investigations.

Add a little JA on SR and Crowdstrike getting access to NSA BULK DATA COLLECTION

and voila.

Focus is back on the 2016 election and we begin to indict [3] HRC/BC, [1]Hussein and reveal what [2] McStain did prior to being executed.

>>8193880

You didn't read what I wrote did you?

Of course Soros is more powerful, the anomaly was Stzrok.

I didn't randomly pull those numbers out of thin air.

Q gave us 4, 10, 20

and he also gave us a ton of drops explaining who [4] [10] and [20] markers are.

Do you think first NP, then Soros, the Stzrok?

A bit anticlimactic.

But when mirrored, stzrok as the first indictment?

Potus has been harping on him pretty hard over the year.

It turns out he also has connections to Soros,

>>8193888

SYN

Because

Checked