It's kind of an axiom in cryptography that the best way to secure an application or algorithm is to publish it (open source) so that security researchers can assess it for security holes. That the company failed to do this speaks volumes. A cryptographic algorithm should be secure as a result of being correctly designed and using strong crypto keys, not as a result of keeping the source code secret.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50EnCsH85Oo
>He wasn't a label that time-warner made up to tag people for demographic marketing.
And neither are we.
Anons reject demographic labels.
Anons are unique individuals.
As autists, we don't fit into neat categories.
There's a crumb – i can't locate it rn – something like 'what if we had a massive data breach' not those words exactly but implying that NSA could "accidentally" release the data?
Anybody can find it?