Anonymous ID: e00a83 Feb. 20, 2020, 2:52 p.m. No.8198700   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8728 >>8769 >>8840 >>8907 >>9038 >>9199 >>9264

Couple days old, but not finding it in recent notables:

 

The World Bank’s “Papergate”: Censorship Is Not the Best Way to Stop Development Aid From Fueling Corruption

 

A new study of World Bank data finds that aid disbursement to highly aid-dependent countries coincides with sharp increases in bank deposits in offshore financial centers. According to The Economist, the World Bank refused to release the study. Afterward, its chief economist resigned. Here is the full content of the allegedly-censored paper.

 

“The World Bank Group considers corruption a major challenge to its twin goals of ending extreme poverty by 2030 and boosting shared prosperity for the poorest 40 percent of people in developing countries.” On its website, the World Bank acknowledges that corruption is one of the main obstacles to development. However, according to a new study, World Bank aid actually fuels corruption: It is no surprise, then, that the World Bank allegedly tried to censor that paper.

 

In its latest issue, The Economist tied the abrupt resignation of World Bank chief economist Pinelopi (Penny) Goldberg with the story told in the paper Elite Capture of Foreign Aid: Evidence from Offshore Bank Accounts. One of that paper’s three authors, Bob Rijkers, is a World Bank economist. The other two are academics: Jorgen Juel Andersen (BI Norwegian Business School) and Niels Johannesen (University of Copenhagen).

 

This paper, The Economist writes,

 

“passed an exacting internal review by other researchers in November. But, according to informed sources, publication was blocked by higher officials.”

 

Promarket article:

https://promarket.org/the-world-banks-papergate-censorship-is-not-the-best-way-to-stop-development-aid-from-fueling-corruption/

 

Link to the actual publication:

http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/493201582052636710/Elite-Capture-of-Foreign-Aid-Evidence-from-Offshore-Bank-Accounts

Anonymous ID: e00a83 Feb. 20, 2020, 3:27 p.m. No.8198969   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9007

>>8198919

Yeah, but in real life experience, Chinese guys really love saying over and over and over, and thinks it bothers white people, who, when hearing it, will feel deep shame and self-loathing.

Anonymous ID: e00a83 Feb. 20, 2020, 3:34 p.m. No.8199052   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8198728

 

THAT is a good question. In my mind, them having to do it surreptitiously and/or with media suppression (which might be the same thing) makes it corrupt anyway. Or is your question just a different lense – way of seeing the same thing? Hmm…