Part 2:

Every Citizen eventually adheres him/herself into de facto slavery to the executive authorities of FEDGOV through supposedly "voluntary" contractual agreements. Three examples:

1) Drivers license - I, and most of you I suspect, do NOT "operate" a "motor vehicle". Those terms are defined in the legal code as commercial activities which fall within the purview of governmental control. The vehicle which I use as a form of personal conveyance along the roadways which I have the right to travel upon is not powered by a motor, which is an electrical device, but instead by an internal combustion engine.

2) IRS - By filling out a W-4 you are not only waiving your 5th amendment right not to be compelled to provide information which can be used against you in a court of law but you are also VOLUNTARILY authorizing your employer to withhold a portion of your wages and send it to FEDGOV, which is more than happy to accept as a gift what it is constitutionally prohibited from imposing as a direct tax. I still have a copy of the 1986 1040 Instructions booklet which includes the IRS' brief letter to taxpayers admitting that our system of FEDERAL income taxation is based upon "voluntary compliance". When the tax honesty movement began gaining some traction and public attention, the IRS dropped the phrase and it has not seen the light of day since.

3) SSA - I was issued a social security number at birth, well before the age of conscious consent. An unconscionable contract is, thus, a revocable contract, although (((they))) will never tell you that. Your SSN is not supposed to be (but is anyway) used for personal identification purposes and is utilized to legally plunder more of the fruits of your labor to be put into the FEDGOV General Fund at the Treasury Department instead of into a trust fund with your name on it. Even your certificate of live birth is kept on file within the Commerce Department of FEDGOV and is monetized as a debt instrument with a nominal value of at least $1,000,000 (as of 1995 when I last dug into this obscenely putrid rabbit hole) which represents the amount of money which can "reasonably" be extracted from you during a lifetime of productive work. There's much more to this constructive fraud than I care to even imagine at this point, but you get the picture.

Part 3:

By the way, not one penny of income tax is ever used, or needed, for useful FEDGOV expenditures. It is all paid to the Class A shareholders of the Federal Reserve (most of whom are foreign banksters themselves) as interest on a national debt which was accrued unlawfully. Our Constitution allows Congress to print money and spend it into circulation interest-free but in 1913 Congress unlawfully delegated that power to the FED, a private cartel of the wealthiest families on the planet who were granted a complete monopoly on the issuance of currency and credit and operate the system for their own personal gain. The 16th Amendment followed soon thereafter since the banksters needed a mechanism for the expropriation of massive amounts of money from the many to the few to pay the usurious rates of interest which applied to the loans primarily provided to FEDGOV through deficit spending.

The IRS, essentially the Fed's collection agent, claims that the amendment gave FEDGOV the authority to impose a direct tax without apportionment on the incomes of the citizenry but the courts ruled without exception during challenges which immediately arose to the new law that the 16th Amendment did not confer any taxing authority which the Congress did not already have. They reiterated the fact that the word "income" was defined as a gain or a profit, terms which apply mainly to corporations. Consequently, the income tax is an indirect tax which can be avoided by anyone who does not engage in any (primarily commercial) activities from which a profit or gain can be derived. Wages are NOT a derivative profit or gain. They ARE just compensation for one's time and energies. To declare one's wages as a gain is equivalent to declaring one's labor as worthless.

Part 4:

Slowly and incrementally over the next half century the IRS code was expanded and amended and deliberately rendered virtually unintelligible to the average Citizen who has always seemed too willing to impose way too much trust in officialdom. An enormous swarm of lawyers, accountants, and other licensed "professionals" affixed themselves and their livelihoods like leeches to the "Code" and cemented the monstrosity firmly into the fabric of the nation. The Victory Tax (http:// constitution.org/tax/us-ic/hist/victorytax.htm) during WWII (sold to the public as necessary to fund the war with promises - not kept obviously - that the tax would end upon cessation of hostilities) and the beginning of mandatory withholding in 1943 served to further embed the insidious practice into the body politic. Fast forward to 2018. Despite the incredible costs of compliance with the mandates, the growing dissatisfaction with the manner in which we fund FEDGOV's activities, the truth about this cancerous and destructive evil in the very soul of our beloved nation reaching more and more ears, and the ever increasing demands for a fairer and simpler system, FEDGOV remains deaf to remonstrances because those who profit from this wholesale theft have apparently placed themselves above and beyond the reach of law, supremely aided and abetted by lawyers, councilors, attorneys, barristers, solicitors, and other legal advocates of every color and description.

If you want some REALLY interesting reading, pick up a copy of Black's or Bouvier's law dictionary and you'll get a fascinating insight into how the rights of the American people have been subjugated to the needs of FEDGOV, itself largely, and not surprisingly, infested with that parasitic class of wordsmiths aka lawyers. If you want to be especially persnickety, you can argue that the British Crown, realizing that military conquest was too expensive and probably impossible anyway, decided instead to conquer Her petulant American colonies through the gradual importation of Her barristers/English Common Law system and Her Bank of England/fractional-reserve, debt-usury-based banking system.

part 5:

The "problem" with the lawyer/bankster class had become enough of a threat by 1810 (!) that a 13th Amendment was proposed and ratified by a number of States (arguments regarding whether the threshold number of States was achieved continue to this day although extant copies of the Constitution dating as late as the 1850's include the amendment) which sought to impose loss of Citizenship and exclusion from public office upon any Citizen who accepted, among other things, a title of nobility or honor from a foreign king or power. Many lawyers to this day place "Esq." behind their names; modern dictionaries define esquire as an "unofficial title of respect" but by 1810 "since attorneys were granted the nobility title of 'esquire', and by English attorneys only, they were considered to be working with and for the powerful European bankers, who also were awarded the title of 'esquire'."   [www.uhuh.com/constitution/am13-fgd.htm]

Whether or not the original 13th Amendment was properly ratified or not, it is overwhelmingly evident by now that lawyers, who have chosen careers as members of the judiciary, should stay there; electing or appointing them to legislative or executive offices is not only unwise it should be vehemently resisted for obvious reasons. The separation of powers deemed so important by the founders and so critical to the proper functioning of a constitutional republic is a delicate balancing act at best. It will eventually topple if one branch accrues too much power at the expense of the other two. The Executive branch today is clearly top dog… a rabid one, to be nice. But a Republic can also fail if one class of licensed men are allowed to write the laws, enact the laws, adjudicate the laws, and enforce the laws. We are a nation of laws, NOT of men. The law is too important to be the sole plaything of a pack of sworn agents of the British Accreditation Registry (otherwise known as the BAR Association- http:// www.angelfire.comazsthurstonHiding_Behind_the_BAR.html).

Part 6:

Consequently, if I am ever unlucky enough to be called to "court" to answer for some pretended offense against "The Crown", I will CHALLENGE the jurisdiction of the court. I will represent MYSELF (i.e pro se) because all BAR-accredited lawyers owe their primary allegiance to the "court" and only secondarily to their client(s). I will NOT enter a plea until the "court" has assured me, to my satisfaction, that it is, indeed, an Article III court of common law which recognizes ALL of my sovereign rights. I will NEVER cross the bar of the courtroom which separates the "officials" from the spectators. Doing so without establishing jurisdiction first amounts to tacit acknowledegement that the "court" can do with you as it pleases. Caveat emptor, my fellow patriots…

Cicero’s (106 BC - 46 BC) warning to the Roman Senate reverberates down the long corridors of history but has regrettably fallen on deaf ears:

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

End of rant…

>>820252

I made the mistake of posting Part 1 too close to the end of bread #1016.

The posting # is 820198

My sincerest apologies for the inconvenience.

>>820436

Merci beaucoup anon…