RED ALERT RED ALERT RED ALERT

POTUS RETWEETED PEDOPHILE SYMPATHIZER, PETER TATCHELL

This is not a drill, verified tweet authentic.

In 1997 Tatchell wrote a letter to The Guardian, defending an academic book about "boy-love", calling the work "courageous", before writing:

The positive nature of some child–adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy. While it may be impossible to condone paedophilia, it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful.

Is this an oversight?!

>>8210283

It's possible, or an oversight. I don't know, but it's BAD optics.

>>8210294

no, mistakes are possible, even in an operation of this scale. It could be an arrow, but we can't not address this issue.

>>8210321

>But if they do have sex before their 16th birthday, they should not be arrested, given a criminal record and put on the sex offenders register.

Uh-huh, a child rape sympathizer. This is rehashed NAMBLA horse shit.

>>8210371

No, read again:

Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13.

>>8210375

>your intelligence is greater than our own POTUS?

That's not the point. It's not about me or us versus POTUS, it is either an arrow OR an oversight, mistakes can happen.

>>8210476

>Consent is key

By law, children cannot consent. I don't care what pedophiles and their apologists have to say about "human sexuality," it's illegal, period, end of analysis.

>>8210573

Under the law a child is a "child" until he or she reaches the age of majority, 18. Therefore, all children are ages 0 to 17, by definition.

>>8210649

Very similar, yes.