Way back I began thinking how this anon movement has multiple layers, including your general argument here. Careful who you follow, deliberate highlighting of potential problems, be wary of paytriots, dangling of carrots to draw in a specific category of citizenry, all of it. Specifically, I began to refer to the far fringes of the Q movement as useful idiots. Their vote is most welcome, even if they are idiots whose vision will never be widely accepted.