>>8219395

>>8219522

Well, your "full-blown" sci-fi theory doesn't suck.

I could be on board with something like that… or ancient satanic/nephilim half-breed shape-shifting lizards as some part of the "separating the wheat from the tares" extinction level event a la Biblical predictions.

>>8219505

New DJT

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1231343206039728128

Fox News has called it for Bernie Sanders

with a gigantic lead of 55% to low 20%'s for the next in line.

56.1% Sanders

20.2% Biden

9.4% Steyer

8.1% Warren

>>8219831

One never knows what'll get picked up. I have 3 Q you's, all for for pretty piss-poor efforts.

>>8219806

>>8219783

I see "wow" (signal?)

"foresight" (could be informing)

"great" is such an over-used word (filtered-kek)

Her name and digits are prob important in some way.

20-11 suggesting Q's "11.3" is tomorrow? Her "since day 1" doesn't hurt that theory. 7-11, 2017…lotta 17/27 stuff there.