>>82341
I've been hearing them in Wisconsin for a couple weeks now. Like 3 times the EAS test.
>>82341
I've been hearing them in Wisconsin for a couple weeks now. Like 3 times the EAS test.
I think tonight may have been a test to see exactly HOW Trump's tweets would be silenced/censored.
I.e. would @Jack do something on Twitter's end? Would blackhat's in the Alphabet Agencies do something sneaky? Any local outages or anything else etc.
It may have been kind of like an EAS test in a way, to see how the PResident's tweets will fair in an emergency situation as alerts.
They can just make new accounts.
I'd suggest having several, and setting automatic tweet programs for scheduled spamming.
If they require a phone number, just go get one of those apps where you can get a number and dial from it.
I was really upset at first, I felt like Trump backed down, and didn't do what he was planning on doing. But now I think it was some kind of trap, and whatever @Jack or blackhats in the CIA/NSA etc.did to cause the link to 404 was something bad and they got caught.
Also, we did do a great job of making it trend. All day. We really DID do a good job in that respect, and there are even a bunch of news articles talking about how CNN won 3 Fakeys etc. It really has a lot of legs.
Fraud.
Doesn't matter. I live in Wisco and this place just showed the world in Nov. 16 that we are nowhere NEAR as liberal as they'd have you think. No way a rural district went to a Dem.
Unless it's just really a small, small, district and the guy is popular and the other not.
Can be anything.
Remember half the elected officials in this country are going to be in jail. It's going to be an entirely different world. Q even said DIRECTLY that
*Q even said DIRECTLY:
"Elections don't matter anymore."
Anyone wanna give me a tl;dr on what's been going on w/MegaAnon? She's had some good posts lately on her Reddit name going back and forth with someone. I stopped following her cuz I thought she might be a Fed/ShareBlue because she was hating on Q, and Q has been proven so it made no sense to call him a Larp.
But now she's changed her tune, and makes it sound like she was just doing it because she wasn't sure she was ALLOWED to acknowledge what she knows about Q or something?
One thing I say to Swedes for instance is, "Don't worry. It's possible your nation and your people might not DESERVE to be saved, so you don't need to worry about it so much if the place gets destroyed by mongrels, because maybe it doesn't deserve not to."
When I look at their Feminist government. Just the craven atheism, it's like meaningless ooga-booga hedonism, just with a little higher IQ. At least Canada has a male leader, albeit a numale, but still.
The no guns thing for internationals is a big sign along with the atheism that maybe these nations don't deserve to be saved.
Canada is still kicking. Just barely though. On life support. Like the U.K. Sweden already gone, like I said. Faster the better.
I stopped following her weeks ago, and trust me, I get what your saying. And I wouldn't even consider it a possibility if I didn't believe there was a good reason she may be telling the truth. She wasn't always anti-Q. I used to follow her closely. Then she was. Then wasn't. Then she tried to do this act, etc. She honestly seemed way back when, like she wasn't sure what she was supposed to do about Q.
And now I get it, this would be a perfect example of someone who is a ShareBlue project, that hasn't got their marching orders yet. And now their orders have chagned and she's supposed to say this to try to salvage credibility.
It's possible. But suspend your disbelief, I'm constantly on the lookout for Feds and disinfo and I think it's possible Meg is legit. Worth checking out.
>>>82619
>Not true at all.
>Some of us want to consider all views and use our own discernment.
>Why would you want to stop this?
>Why would you want to speak for all of us here?
>Why would you have this agenda?
>Why not give an example of a pattern of where meganon has been wrong?
>Why not balance this with where she has been right?
>There is only one reason for your post.
>The information goes against the agenda of the interests that pay you.
This. That guy is shilling hard. I wonder why. Might be worth looking into after all.
Yes. This is absolutely part of it. We already know what happened in Hawaii.
Attempted false flag to drag us into WWIII.
Bill, HRC, Huma, McCain made sure to be publicly seen as on the island
Planned to sneak off on a plane
Container nuke on the island.
Purposely set off the ICBM alarm a few hours before the planned detonation to make it seem like NK
Trump's "eyes and ears everywhere" knew about the plan, and swapped the nuke out for a dud.
Now they need an excuse for why the alarm. Said it was an accident.
This is why Potters and other shills are trying to say "It was a real attack! From a sub!" To try to salvage the plan to drag us into WWIII.
>>>82636
>This person reasons in the same way as the BO from CBTS. Choose caution.
>I believe in having as much info as possible so anons can use their own discernment.
>I am not scared of information.
>I don't tell people what to read and more importantly I don't tell people what NOT to read. The fake news does that.
>>>82636
>This person reasons in the same way as the BO from CBTS. Choose caution.
>I believe in having as much info as possible so anons can use their own discernment.
>I am not scared of information.
>I don't tell people what to read and more importantly I don't tell people what NOT to read. The fake news does that.
And the BO from CBTS are GLOWING, even Tracy. And they wouldn't be doing it if there wasn't a good reason.
>Please use your own discernment anons.
I know. I only started learning about all this spy vs. spy shit a year ago. It's a lot to try to follow. The tactics they use involve mindblowing double and triple reverse plots and disinfo.
The best solution for us on the internet, IMO, is to just verbally lay out each possibility clearly and simply, then people can at least see what they are choosing to believe and what the opportunity cost of that choice is.
Hey Anon, I noticed you were one that picked up on the shilling about MegaAnon. It was a surprise because I had mentioned her kinda casually, I didn't think it that important, but the shilling is FEVERISH, clearly we're over a target I didn't realize, but the answer about what they don't want us looking into is something called
"Tofsee"
Not sure exactly how it's so important, but Meg was freaking out about it and said the Map led to it. If what you said about BitCoin is true, maybe that's what the big deal is. It's traceable cuz of this tofsee or whatever.
I'm with ya bro.
Also, I wonder if his morning tweets that said The Wallโฆ The Wall. like that means to highlight the WW? Could it mean WWlll? There's one more l in there since it's 2 "Wall" words but. Wall and Wall. Has WWlll contained in it?
I gotta confess, I kinda have a spy vs. spy s&m kinda fantasy about that woman. Like I catch her or something, and to survive, she has to do everything I say, and I turn her out in the process into a double agent, cuz I got all her data.
It's at some high class hotel in Monte Carlo or something, where all these diplomats and what not would go.
There's like, a fancy bed, are all these like, pistols and silencers and high heels and danger and stuff.
Yeaโฆ
You've thought the same thing about her. We all have.
Don't try to say you haven't.
And it's like, you know she's a dirty girl, cuz she was Weiner's wife, and that dude's a total perve soโฆ