the route of that graphic charts out some conjecture that some called 'the map' some called other things that, usually in caps, so it was the MAP, and that chart seemed useful to glance down. To me it was a gloss. So much of what I know personally was not there, whole swathes of important history. and a lot of it is def 'deep conjecture' that is true in a meta, and maybe true here, but . . . not provable, and some seemed unkind, but unkind people often deserve to be described as such.
but I always found that graphic interesting, and, because I know we 'think for ourselves' I also knew that it was a guide to what people might conjecture and know is possibly incorrect, but that they might encounter others who would say 'no, that's true'.
so it helped as a way to decypher some of the alternatives.
the problem with such graphics for some is that they are desparate to label anyone who counters their important and sanction censor's narrative as an extreame hater akin to the worst type, and thus they then sentence these worst-types for pogrom. the 'reeducation camp' mentality.
when you understand that the graphic doesn't represent a platform, buy a map of possible conjecture, within a propability space, it's very useful to go over once or twice.
if you think it's 'true' you shouldn't even look at it. you lack and open mind that can embrace other possibilities. You don't deal in conjecture, you only deal in what message you are fed by your feed from who ever it is has been feeding you.