Anonymous ID: 1f2078 Feb. 24, 2020, 9:58 a.m. No.8235130   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5155

>>8235063

the route of that graphic charts out some conjecture that some called 'the map' some called other things that, usually in caps, so it was the MAP, and that chart seemed useful to glance down. To me it was a gloss. So much of what I know personally was not there, whole swathes of important history. and a lot of it is def 'deep conjecture' that is true in a meta, and maybe true here, but . . . not provable, and some seemed unkind, but unkind people often deserve to be described as such.

but I always found that graphic interesting, and, because I know we 'think for ourselves' I also knew that it was a guide to what people might conjecture and know is possibly incorrect, but that they might encounter others who would say 'no, that's true'.

so it helped as a way to decypher some of the alternatives.

the problem with such graphics for some is that they are desparate to label anyone who counters their important and sanction censor's narrative as an extreame hater akin to the worst type, and thus they then sentence these worst-types for pogrom. the 'reeducation camp' mentality.

 

when you understand that the graphic doesn't represent a platform, buy a map of possible conjecture, within a propability space, it's very useful to go over once or twice.

if you think it's 'true' you shouldn't even look at it. you lack and open mind that can embrace other possibilities. You don't deal in conjecture, you only deal in what message you are fed by your feed from who ever it is has been feeding you.

Anonymous ID: 1f2078 Feb. 24, 2020, 10:07 a.m. No.8235201   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8235155

not me, I'm not giving outside links like that.

was there a honey pot link?

ya, no one should go off and search a graphic on a honey pot link.

but they ought to have a copy of that graphic.

the one that the other anon provided didn't seem quite colored well, I've seen it done much better.

your assessement of this is good.

And when I said 'you' at the end of my post, I dind't mean it as you, personally, anon.

the style of 'when one' verse 'when you' is one that I flip between when I'm writing conjecture.

 

So when I say 'if you think it's true . . .' I could have been clearer 'if one thinks it's true' . to me it means the same, but people do get confused. I'm not trying to be personal about what you see the map as, but that people can use it, but don't take it as a platform or statement of 'truth'.

Anonymous ID: 1f2078 Feb. 24, 2020, 10:36 a.m. No.8235435   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5479 >>5495

>>8235413

but we all know that if we point it out they make it hell for us in that bread. you think they ever got the number changed on that one bread? I merely pointed it out and got gang staulked.

10537 was numbered incorrect. Baker said it would take 16 hrs because he couldn't do it.

Anonymous ID: 1f2078 Feb. 24, 2020, 10:49 a.m. No.8235544   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8235531

I have been watching travel videos of various parts of the world to keep me off main stream media.

you might want to watch one about Tuscany and Italy and note that almost all the buildings are built with arches.