These witnesses were incredibly boring. What makes them think anyone wants to read what they have to say, or what their ghostwriter has to say? The only one remotely interesting and very well spoken was Fiona Hill, and I wouldn't wanna read her book either, should she happen to write one.
How about this: A list of twitter accounts that have been posted by Q.
That's something we can't argue about. Not an endorsement, just fact. Here are the accounts that Q has referenced in posts.
Because we don't want to get involved in endorsing any twitter accounts and then have that account turn out to be a phony and then look like an ass for endorsing. It's that simple.
Plus we've all managed to think for ourselves so far without following any lists.
Didn't find another source for this. The site wants me to sign up or disable my ad blocker in order to read the article. Would you be so kind as to post a cap of the article? Thanks!
You're correct, anon. It felt good to rant, though.