Question: have any of you anons felt as if Q were directly responding to something you placed in the "Letters of Gratitude" bread?
We all know he's communicated to all kinds of people–LDR, backchannels to other countries, agents waiting for authorization codes for things we can't really quite fathom yet, etc.. "Do comms only go to Anons?" Nope.
From Q 513:
>IMPORTANT:
>NO private comms past/present/future.
>NO comms made outside of this platform.
So concerning these operations at least, Q only communicates via the official boards. Some time after that post, the BO set up the "Letters of Gratitude" bread so people wouldn't keep clogging up the research. Not long after that, Q responded:
Q 1025:
>We are sincerely appreciative for your kind words and appreciation. Means more than you know. Each one read in full. We are in this together. WWG1WGA.
>2018 will be glorious!!
>God bless,
>Q
This post is significant for two reasons–the first is that it establishes Q as a "we," and the second is that it implies that every thank-you letter posted is read in full.
I've posted on that bread several times–usually when I am feeling grateful, at times when I felt frustrated or concerned. I have often felt as if my letters had been answered in Q's posts, though I hate to talk about it. Yesterday, I posted a letter on the "Appreciation" bread as a joke:
>>8231896 (db)
(pics related)
Today, as I was catching up on the notables, Q started posting in the bread–and the last line of his first post was:
>[assumptions correct - package well rec [known]]
I'm not putting this out there to say that I'm special–I'm wondering if maybe we're missing links here? My "letter" was a couple of joke images implying Bernie Sanders had been compromised by a Russian agent. I don't think that would surprise any of us…but what if Q was referring to my joke and confirming it to actually be true? What if we could go back to some of the other posts that have similar lines, and match them to other "Letters of Gratitude?"
I hate it when people assume that it's all about them, and I don't want to throw anybody off. But for the sake of making connections, maybe we should be looking over some of those letters when it sounds like Q is speaking directly to someone.