My thoughts on Consitutional Crisis >>824695
Q has said political parties won't matter anymore.
POTUS keeps focusing on mid-term elections.
Q spoke about the extent of the corruption in DC, both parties.
If a substantial fraction (say, 1/3 or 1/2) of the legislature were indicted for treason or found guilty, then we'd have a non-functional legislature, until substitutes could be appointed by their states' governors. But elections would still matter to fill those seats with permanent reps.
If a significant number of judges were corrupt and removed for treason, we'd have non-functional civilian courts.
If these matters were tried and appealed to the Supreme Court (highest court of appeal in the land) but there were not enough justices remaining to judge the case because some were removed for treason, that would be a crisis.
Supreme Court judges are appointed by the president but have to be approved by the Senate? So if the Senate was unable to muster a quorum to vote on Justices' appointments, a crisis.
It goes on and on.
I believe the Constitutional Crisis will be due to significant numbers of persons in the Executive, Legislative, and/or Judicial branches of government being removed from office for heinous crimes.
The Constitution does provide for certain contingencies like an order of succession in case certain officials are unable to serve. But those contingencies really don't handle the succession if the majority of government is out of commission.